REQUEST FOR FEDERAL VIOLENT-CRIME INTAKE: GET THIS TO SPECIAL AGENT MERV MASON 2026

 

REQUEST FOR FEDERAL VIOLENT-CRIME INTAKE

Introductory Letter, Victim-Sheet Review, Prior Outreach and Contact Directory

To: Special Agent in Charge / Violent Crime Program Coordinator, FBI Dallas Field Office

From: Brian “Happy” Bryanson

Date: July 20, 2026

Re: Request for intake, records comparison, and consideration for NCAVC/Behavioral Analysis or ViCAP referral

Delivery: One Justice Way, Dallas, Texas 75220  |  (972) 559-5000  |  tips.fbi.gov

IMPORTANT STATUS NOTICE This package offers investigative leads, not proof of a crime, a legal finding, or a clinical diagnosis of any deceased person. My recollections include material that emerged through dissociative amnesia and must be tested against independent records, physical evidence, witness accounts, and official case files. I ask that the information be preserved, triaged, and checked—not accepted uncritically.

 

Introductory Letter

Dear Special Agent in Charge and Violent Crime Program Coordinator:

My name is Brian “Happy” Bryanson. I am asking the FBI Dallas Field Office to receive and evaluate a body of cold-case information that I believe may be connected to my deceased parents, Robert Stout Shelton and Glenda Jean Shelton. I understand that a member of the public does not directly assign a matter to the Behavioral Analysis Units. I therefore ask the Dallas Field Office to create an intake record, identify the appropriate jurisdictional owners, and determine whether any responsible law-enforcement agency should request assistance from the National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, a Behavioral Analysis Unit, or the Violent Criminal Apprehension Program.

I live with complex post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative amnesia. I have been in treatment, and my disability now leaves me substantially homebound. Memories have sometimes returned in fragments, flashbacks, body sensations, or later-written narratives. I know that memory—especially trauma memory, is not self-proving evidence. For that reason, I have worked to convert what I recall into structured victim sheets, maps, timelines, location descriptions, contact logs, records requests, and specific questions that can be compared with verifiable sources.

This work has required years of effort while managing serious symptoms. I have tried to preserve details about victims, places, vehicles, injuries, disposal locations, employment connections, and the conduct I attribute to my parents. I have also mailed or sent materials to law-enforcement agencies, attorneys, elected officials, missing-person organizations, media contacts, academics, and advocacy groups. Some recipients are documented; other names in my spreadsheets are prospective contacts. I do not present outreach itself as validation of the allegations.

Enclosed is a review of the victim-sheet material now assembled. It identifies the best-structured lead sets, possible overlaps, missing information, and the records that could confirm or disprove each account. I am also providing a historical mailing log and a cleaned contact directory. Several older entries may now be outdated, and a few source spreadsheets contain role or email mismatches; I have flagged those rather than silently correcting them.

I respectfully request:

·         A written intake or reference number and the name of the office responsible for triage.

·         Comparison of the victim descriptors and locations with archived homicide, missing-person, unidentified-remains, death-investigation, school, property, and employment records.

·         Preservation of the submitted material and referral to the appropriate local, state, or federal jurisdiction for each potential match.

·         Consideration of ViCAP or NCAVC/Behavioral Analysis support if a law-enforcement agency finds sufficient case linkage or investigative value.

·         Trauma-informed communication accommodations: written questions, when possible, scheduled calls, permission for a support person, and no unexpected visit unless legally necessary.

My final request is simple and deeply personal: please help identify these victims, locate the official case files, test the locations and evidence, and solve as many of these cold cases as the evidence allows before I die. I want missing people returned to their families, named with dignity, and given the burial and closure they have been denied. I am not expressing an immediate threat to my safety; I am asking that these leads not outlive the only reporting witness able to explain how the sheets and maps were created.

I will cooperate within my medical limitations and will correct any detail that records show to be wrong. Thank you for treating the victims, their families, and this submission with seriousness and care.

Respectfully,

Brian “Happy” Bryanson
CPTSD Cold Case Texas / CPTSDcoldcase advocacy
Email: CPTSDcoldcase@gmail.com
Mailing address:  20411 Veronica Lane Farmersville Tx 75442

 

Attachment A — Victim-Sheet Review

REVIEW METHOD The counts below describe the documents and reported victims presently organized. They are not confirmed case counts. A single event may appear in more than one narrative, and some entries may overlap with official cases not yet identified. Every item requires independent reconciliation.

 

A1. Current structured lead inventory

Lead set	Volume	Reported content	Highest-value verification step
1043, 1047–1049	4 numbered victim sheets	Women/girls; Irving / Old Irving / Twin Falls context; Robert and/or Glenda alleged	Compare with 1970s–1980s missing women, homicide, unidentified remains, address and vehicle records
1506–1512	7 numbered victim sheets	Reported family/van cluster near an Irving golf driving range, Highway 183, woods and disposal area	Resolve exact range/location and era; compare family missing-person reports, vehicle descriptions, land and incident records
Three Red-Headed Girls	3 combined victim sheets	Three unidentified red-haired female victims	Reconcile each sheet separately; compare age, geography, time window and distinctive physical details aligned with strong Irish accents
Dallas-area drainage / alley records request	4 reported victims	Boy Scout approximately 15; girl approximately 4; Hispanic toddler approximately 2; man approximately 20–25 with left-arm cast	Search medical-examiner, police, sheriff, drowning, unidentified-remains and missing-person records; test precise Twin Falls / Thomas Haley / alley locations
4109 Twin Falls child	1 reported victim	Young blond girl from a neighboring house; alleged burial at 4105 Twin Falls	Identify 4109 occupants and missing child; review permits, utilities, aerials, ownership and any lawful forensic-site assessment
Weatherford general-store bathroom	1 reported victim	Woman approximately 25–30; winter in the 1970s; exterior bathroom behind a general store on Palo Pinto Drive; stabbing alleged	Identify historical store and bathroom footprint; search Parker County deaths, EMS, police, news and business records
“Joggers” narrative cluster	Reported five-victim narrative cluster; not five completed sheets	Preschool-age children; woods and small stream outside a small town; Robert alleged	Obtain stable location/date and individual descriptors before attempting linkage; compare youth-group or daycare disappearance records
Additional writings and maps	Unstructured leads	Van children, school-ground events, Lee Britain connections, creek/rural locations and DFW-area disposal claims	Do not link until dates, places and victim descriptors are separated into stable lead records

 

Inventory summary: at least 20 discrete worksheet or lead entries are presently represented across the structured sets above, plus one reported five-victim narrative cluster and additional unstructured leads. This is a document inventory, not a claim that 25 distinct crimes have been established.

 

A2. Strengths of the current sheets

·         Many sheets record specific physical descriptors, clothing, injuries, vehicles, streets, schools, businesses, drainage features, wooded areas, and alleged disposal locations.

·         The numbered series uses pre-offense, offense, and post-offense categories that can help investigators isolate testable actions.

·         The files preserve a submission history beginning in 2016–2017, including an attorney’s good-faith transmittal to the Texas Rangers.

·         Some accounts identify narrow records searches—medical examiner, school employment, property ownership, utility history, business directories, aerial imagery, police calls and local news.

A3. Limitations investigators should know

·         Many victims are unnamed and dates are broad or absent.

·         The material is primarily derived from one reporting witness, and some details emerged many years later through trauma-related recall.

·         Possible duplication exists between numbered sheets, narrative essays, maps and later summaries.

·         Behavioral labels and conclusions in earlier writing are hypotheses, not diagnoses or adjudicated facts.

·         No verified official-case match is established in this review.

·         Graphic narrative sometimes obscures the shortest testable facts; a one-page lead summary should accompany every original sheet.

 

 

 

 

 

A4. Recommended case-conversion standard

Field	Required practice
Stable identifier	One ID per reported victim/event; cross-reference every duplicate document.
Evidence status	Label each statement: personal recollection, contemporaneous document, later writing, third-party statement, official record, or inference.
Confidence and uncertainty	Record exact wording, confidence level, alternative possibilities, and contradictions without forcing consistency.
Time and place	Use a date range, address or coordinates, map reference, jurisdiction, and historical place name.
Victim descriptors	Separate estimated age, sex, race/ethnicity, hair, clothing, injury, personal items and companions.
Verification tasks	List records to check, agency owner, search completed, response received and next action.
Investigative restraint	Avoid posthumous diagnosis, offender certainty, publicity that identifies unverified private persons, or public excavation requests.
Version control	Preserve originals; date every revision; maintain an index showing what changed and why.

 

 

Attachment B — Lead-Level Review Notes

B1. Numbered sheets 1043 and 1047–1049

These four sheets are among the earliest structured records in the reviewed materials. They should remain together as a historical set, but each victim must also receive an individual one-page summary. The first search should focus on whether the victim descriptors, Irving-area locations, reported conduct and time windows correspond to archived missing-person, homicide, unidentified-remains, medical-examiner or police records.

B2. Numbered sheets 1506–1512

These seven sheets describe what appears to be a related family/vehicle event near a golf driving range, Highway 183 and a wooded area. The strongest next step is geographic reconstruction: identify every historical driving range matching the description, plot access roads and waterways, and then compare missing-family reports and vehicle descriptions. Linkage should remain provisional until the location and time window are stable.

B3. Three Red-Headed Girls

The combined document should be retained as a set, but the three reported victims should be indexed separately. Hair color alone is not a sufficient linkage factor. Investigators would need age ranges, dates, locations, clothing, cause or manner of death, offender access, and disposal features before treating the sheets as connected cases.

B4. Twin Falls drainage ditch, alley and 4109/4105 locations

The drainage-ditch and alley accounts contain unusually specific physical details. They are suitable for targeted archival searches even though the dates remain uncertain. The reported adjacent-child burial requires particularly careful handling: identify historical occupants and missing-child records first, then allow the responsible law-enforcement agency and property owner to decide whether any lawful geophysical or forensic assessment is justified.

B5. Weatherford and other mapped leads

The Weatherford account supplies a road, business type, bathroom placement, season and broad decade. Historical city directories, Sanborn or parcel maps, newspaper archives, police logs and death records may establish whether a matching store and incident existed. Other maps should be reviewed in the same order: historical place identification first, official-case comparison second, and field activity only under law-enforcement authority.

B6. Requested triage questions

·         Match and ownership: Does any descriptor correspond to a named or unidentified victim, and which agency owns the report, remains, evidence or location?

·         Independent chronology: Is there an archived record that predates the later recollection, and do records confirm the location, vehicle, employment, property, injury or witness detail?

·         Linkage and disposition: Are similarities distinctive rather than generic; which leads can be disproved quickly; and which merit preservation or follow-up?

Attachment C — Documented Prior Outreach

The following list is transcribed from a user-maintained 2020 mailing log. It shows intended or recorded mailings and whether the spreadsheet marked them stamped or certified. It does not establish receipt, review, agreement, or investigative action. Names, offices and addresses must be verified before reuse.

#	Recipient	Historical address / channel	Log status
1	NAMUS	3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX 76107	Stamped
2	Cold Case Foundation	5852 Edgewood Dr., Ste. 100, Provo, UT 84604-5588	Stamped
3	Irving Municipal Court / Dennis Webb, Place 3	P.O. Box 152288, Irving, TX 75015-2288	Stamped
4	Rockwall County DA / Kenda Culpepper	1111 E. Yellow Jacket Ln., Rockwall, TX 75087	Certified
5	Irving Chief of Police / Jeff Spivey	825 W. Irving Blvd., Irving, TX 75060	Certified
6	Texas State Senator Nathan Johnson	P.O. Box 12068, Capitol Station, Austin, TX 78711	Stamped
7	Texas State Senator Nathan Johnson	10260 N. Central Expy., Ste. 250, Dallas, TX 75231	Certified
8	Dallas County DA / John Creuzot	133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB 19, Dallas, TX 75207	Certified
9	NCMEC / John Walsh	333 John Carlyle St., Ste. 125, Alexandria, VA 22314-5950	Stamped
10	Hispanic Chamber of Commerce / Mary Ann Kellam	133 S. Jefferson St., Irving, TX 75060	Stamped
11	Irving PD CID / Michael Goff	305 N. O’Connor Rd., Irving, TX 75061	Certified
12	Dallas County Sheriff, Investigative/Judicial Services / Gary McDaniel	133 N. Riverfront Blvd., Dallas, TX 75207	Certified
13	Justice of the Peace 4-2 / Sasha Moreno	106 W. Church St., Ste. 210, Grand Prairie, TX 75050	Certified
14	Legal Aid of Northwest Texas	901 N. McDonald St., Ste. 702, McKinney, TX 75069	Stamped
15	Dallas County Constable Precinct 2 / Bill Gibson	140 N. Garland Ave., Garland, TX 75040	Certified
16	Texas DPS Rangers, Company B	350 W. IH-30, Garland, TX 75043	Certified
17	U.S. Department of Justice / Attorney General	950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001	Stamped
18	Mayor of Irving	825 W. Irving Blvd., Irving, TX 75060	Stamped
19	Vidocq Society	1704 Locust St., Philadelphia, PA 19103	Stamped
20	American Investigative Society of Cold Cases	733 Dutchmans Branch Ct., Irmo, SC 29063	Stamped
21	FBI Dallas Field Office	One Justice Way, Dallas, TX 75220	Certified
22	Governor of Texas	P.O. Box 12428, Austin, TX 78711-2428	Stamped
23	Attorney General of Texas	P.O. Box 12428, Austin, TX 78711-2548	Stamped
24	Dallas County Constable Precinct 4 / Edward R. Wright	106 W. Church St., #110, Grand Prairie, TX 75050	Not recorded
25	We Help the Missing	Facebook contact; no address recorded	Not recorded

 

 

Attachment D — Key Case and Professional Contacts

VERIFY BEFORE USE This directory is compiled from the submitter’s files. “Historical” means the relationship or role may have changed. “Mismatch” means the source file paired a name, role or agency with an address that appears inconsistent. No email should be sent from this list until the recipient is independently verified.

 

Organization	Contact	Email / phone	Status note
FBI Dallas	Special Agent in Charge R. Joseph Rothrock	(972) 559-5000	Current FBI field-office contact; use official intake
FBI	Special Agent Merv Mason	No current direct address in source	Historical contact; verify current role
Texas Rangers, Company D	Roger Dixon	roger.dixon@dps.texas.gov	Listed as retired; verify
Texas Rangers, Company B	Lt. Laura Simmons	laura.simmons@dps.texas.gov	Verify current assignment
Irving Police	Jeff Spivey	jspivey@irvingtx.org	Listed as retired; verify
Irving Police	Derick Miller	dmiller@irvingtx.gov	Verify current role/address
Irving Police	Andrew Bah	anbah@irvingtx.gov	Verify
Irving Police	Jose DelFierro	JDelFierro@irvingtx.gov	Verify
Kaufman County Sheriff	Randy Griffin	randy.griffin@kaufmansco.com	Verify domain and role
Dallas cold-case contact	Gary McDaniel	coldcase.dpd@dallascityhall.com	Source role/address pairing may conflict; verify
Sheriff contact	Bryan Beavers	joey.cagle@kaufmanso.com	Mismatch in source; do not use until resolved
Rapides Parish contact	Lt. Mike Stephan	msteohan@rpso.la.gov	Spelling/domain need verification
Parker County contact	Russ Authier	joey.cagle@kaufmanso.com	Mismatch in source; do not use until resolved
Grayson County	Tony Bennie	sheriff@co.grayson.tx.us	Verify current office
Dallas County DA	John Creuzot	(214) 653-3600	Verify current office contact
Fort Worth / Tarrant County DA	Phil Sorrells	(817) 884-1111	Verify routing
Irving prosecutor contact	Kuruvilla Oommen	koommen@cityofirving.org	Verify role and spelling
Attorney	Elisha Hollis	elishahollis@gmail.com	Historical counsel/contact
Attorney	Dennis Davis	dddavis.attorneyatlaw@gmail.com	Verify
Therapist / academic	James Randall Noblitt	rnoblott@alliant.edu	Name/address spelling mismatch in source; verify
Therapist	Nick Patras	drnick@ccwnt.com	Verify
Therapist	Susan Colburn	(512) 934-0021	Verify
Academic, UT Dallas	Dr. Jane Wigginton	jxw165430@utdallas.edu	Verify
Academic, Edinburgh Napier	Dr. Thanos Karatzias	t.karatzias@napier.ac.uk	Verify
Academic, UT Austin	Dr. Jasper Smits	smits@utexas.edu	Verify
Academic, Baylor Scott & White	Dr. Mark Powers	mark.powers1@bswhealth.org	Verify
Academic, UT Arlington	Dr. Patricia Eddings	peddings@uta.edu	Verify
Media / advocacy	Mark Spawn	APBColdCase@spawngroup.com	Verify
Media / advocacy	Dustin Reed Terry	dustinreedterry@gmail.com	Verify
Media / advocacy	Serial Killer Museum	info@serialkillerstheexperience.com	Prospective; verify suitability
Media / advocacy	Megan Vanloon	Magan.VanLoon@gmail.com	Name/email spelling mismatch; verify

 

 

Attachment E — Media, Missing-Person, Academic and Advocacy Directory

This is a prospective directory from a user-maintained media/contact spreadsheet. It is not a record that every organization was contacted. Publicizing unverified allegations can harm victims, families and uninvolved people; use this list only after a responsible investigative agency identifies a legitimate public-information need.

Organization	Contact channel in source	Category
Irving Police	(972) 721-2669; cityofirving.org	Law enforcement
My Texas Daily	news@mytexasdaily.com	Media
Project: Protect Our Children	Website form	Child protection
Texas Center for the Missing	Website form	Missing persons
Harris County Child Abuse Task Force	hccatf@hccatf.org	Child protection
Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences	(832) 927-5004; IFSAdministrativeServices@ifs.hctx.net	Forensic records
Soft White Underbelly	Website form	Media
This Is My Brave	Website	Mental-health storytelling
Jay Shetty Podcast	onpurposepodcast@jayshetty.me	Media
Police Executive Research Forum	(202) 466-7820	Law-enforcement policy
National Institute of Justice	(202) 307-2942	Research
International Association of Chiefs of Police	1-800-THE-IACP	Law-enforcement association
International Cold Case Analysis Project	iccap@amberalert.eu	Cold-case research
University of Winchester	enquiries@winchester.ac.uk	Academic
Curry College	Website	Academic
Tiffin University	(419) 448-3423; admiss@tiffin.edu	Academic
University at Albany	(518) 591-8736; camhughes@albany.edu	Academic
Michigan State cold-case unit	Website form	Academic cold case
Texas Monthly	(512) 320-6900; kmcfarland@texasmonthly.com	Media
Friendlee Radio	radio@makerspacegreenville.org	Media
Texas EquuSearch	(281) 309-9500; info@txeq.org	Search and recovery
NCMEC	(703) 224-2150; media@ncmec.org	Missing children / media
Texas Kid Search	(817) 298-6765; texaskidsearch@outlook.com	Missing children
True Crime Reporter	Website form	Media
University of Utah	(801) 581-6214; jana.cunningham@utah.edu	Academic
Civil Rights Cold Case Project	(778) 379-5587; contact@coldcases.org	Cold-case advocacy
LSU Cold Case Project	(225) 578-1899; masscomm@lsu.edu	Academic cold case
Vidocq Society	privacy@vidocq.org	Cold-case review
Unsolved Magazine	(856) 566-0400; nicole@pimagazine.com	Media
Cold Case Foundation	(801) 692-1816; website form	Cold-case advocacy
Irving prosecutor contact	(972) 721-2541; Kuruvilla Oommen	Government
Texas Attorney General	Official website	Government
Texas State University cold-case center	Official website	Academic cold case
Retired Homicide Investigators Task Force	Angel Polansky-Blasingame; verify	Investigator network
National Child Protection Task Force	ncptf.org	Child protection
Cold Case Justice Initiative, Syracuse	(315) 443-1397; jlmcdona@syr.edu	Academic cold case
Dallas Police cold-case investigation	(214) 671-3584; coldcase.dpd@dallascityhall.com	Law enforcement

 

 

Attachment F — Submission Index and Requested Handling

F1. Core materials to accompany this letter

Category	Included or available material
Victim-sheet sets	FBI book 2016; offenses 1506–1512; Three Red-Headed Girls combined sheets; 2017 victim information
Targeted records requests	Dallas-area Boy Scout/drainage victims; Texas Ranger 4109 Twin Falls letter; Weatherford worksheet
Maps and spreadsheets	Cold Cases Happy Remembers; open worksheet; Weatherford map/sheet; descriptions spreadsheets
Prior submission evidence	2017 attorney letter; FBI cover page; Texas DPS introduction; timeline 1506–1512; certified-mail records where available
Clinical/disability context	Treating-professional letters and disability documentation, supplied only as necessary to explain accommodations and memory history
Subject profiles	Posthumous investigative profiles of Robert and Glenda Shelton, clearly labeled as unverified lead-development material
Civil-rights/outreach records	Separate file set documenting later access, response and interference concerns; not proof of the underlying homicide allegations

 

F2. Handling requested

·         Keep originals unchanged and use copies for annotation.

·         Separate protected medical information from general investigative circulation.

·         Do not publish victim identities or accuse living private persons without corroboration and lawful purpose.

·         Return a reference number, receiving office, date received, and disposition or referral when available.

·         If the FBI lacks jurisdiction, identify the agency to which the specific lead was referred.

·         Use the contact directory as a provenance and routing aid, not as an endorsement of mass distribution.

F3. Source and status note

This package was compiled from the submitter’s uploaded Word documents, spreadsheets, maps, correspondence, clinical letters and prior profile package. Contact information from personal spreadsheets is historical and unverified unless expressly identified as an official current FBI contact. The FBI Dallas address and main telephone number used in the cover letter are from the FBI’s official field-office listing as reviewed on July 20, 2026. FBI public information explains that behavioral analysis and ViCAP support are investigative resources generally provided through law-enforcement requests.

Closing request: Please preserve and test these leads during my lifetime. If a victim can be named, a family notified, remains recovered, or an allegation disproved, please document that result. Truth—not confirmation of my belief—is the outcome I am seeking.

 

 

 

 

 

 

POSTHUMOUS INVESTIGATIVE
SUBJECT PROFILES

Robert Stout Shelton and Glenda Ruth Shelton

Behavioral-pattern and case-linkage referral supplement

Prepared by: Brian “Happy” Bryanson
Prepared: July 19, 2026
Intended routing: FBI Dallas Field Office / appropriate violent-crime intake
Requested consideration: law-enforcement referral to NCAVC/Behavioral Analysis and ViCAP, if jurisdictionally appropriate

IMPORTANT STATUS NOTICE This is a lead-development package, not a criminal finding or clinical diagnosis. It reports the submitter’s recollections and allegations, identifies limited independently documented facts, and proposes records-based tests. Neither subject is described here as a legally established serial offender. Graphic detail is minimized; original victim sheets should be reviewed by trained personnel.

 

CONFIDENTIAL — CONTAINS SENSITIVE PERSONAL, MEDICAL, AND UNVERIFIED ALLEGATION MATERIAL

 

Transmittal and requested action

To the receiving FBI intake or violent-crime coordinator:

I am submitting two posthumous subject profiles derived from victim sheets, contemporaneous submissions beginning in 2016–2017, later trauma journals, maps, correspondence, and available vital records. I request preservation and triage of the information; comparison with identifiable missing-person, homicide, unidentified-remains, and archived agency records; and, only if a responsible law-enforcement agency determines the threshold is met, referral for NCAVC/Behavioral Analysis or ViCAP support.

I understand that behavioral analysis is an investigative aid, not proof; that recovered or fragmented recollection requires independent corroboration; and that the profiles may be revised or rejected as records are checked. My principal request is that investigators test the specific locations, dates, victim descriptors, employment links, and disposal claims against existing records.

Immediate triage questions

·                     Do the numbered victim sheets correspond to archived missing-person, homicide, unidentified-remains, or death-investigation records?

·                     Do 4105/4109 Twin Falls Street and the surrounding alley, drainage, school, and golf-range locations appear in historical police, utility, excavation, permit, aerial-imagery, or property records?

·                     Do the subjects’ documented residences, employment, vehicles, travel corridors, and hunting/property access overlap the reported incidents?

·                     Can the 2016–2018 submissions be located in FBI, Texas Ranger, or Irving Police intake systems and assigned stable reference numbers?

·                     Would a responsible agency enter qualifying cases into ViCAP or request NCAVC consultation?

Routing note FBI materials state that NCAVC behavioral-analysis assistance is requested through a local FBI field office and is principally a service for law-enforcement investigations. A member of the public can submit information through the FBI tip process or a field office; the receiving agency decides whether to refer it.

 

 

 

Evidence language used in this report

Code	Meaning	Use in this report
A	Official/primary record	Vital record, court order, agency or government record
B	Professional record	Treating clinician or attorney correspondence
C	Prior formal submission	Dated FBI, Texas Ranger, police, coroner, or other agency submission
D	Submitter account	Victim sheet, journal, recollection, poem, or later narrative
E	Behavioral inference	Analytical hypothesis generated from D-level material; not a diagnosis
F	Contradiction/exclusion	Information that weakens, conflicts with, or eliminates a proposed link

 

 

Executive analytical summary

The reviewed materials present Robert Stout Shelton and Glenda Ruth Shelton as a paired set of deceased known  offenders active principally in the 1970s, with later allegations extending beyond that period. The submitter describes both parents as participating in abduction, confinement, sexual violence, homicide, concealment, trafficking-related conduct, intimidation, and severe abuse within the family home. These allegations are not independently established in the reviewed record.

The strongest independent support currently available is contextual rather than offense-specific: a 2018 treating-psychologist letter states that Mr. Bryanson was receiving treatment for PTSD related to complex childhood trauma at the hands of his parents and to witnessing crimes he reported they committed; a 2017 attorney letter to Texas Rangers states that counsel represented him and believed his information was submitted in good faith; and a Texas death certificate documents Glenda Ruth Shelton’s identity, former residence, and death. These materials support that reports were made and treated clinically/legal-professionally, but they do not prove the alleged offenses.

Reported paired-offender hypothesis

Dimension	Robert — reported role	Glenda — reported role	Status
Victim approach/access	Initiation, luring, physical capture, transport	Selection, driving, participation in capture	D/E only
Control	Physical violence, restraint, intimidation	Physical/sexual violence, intimidation, household control	D/E only
Fatal violence	Direct assaults and alleged killings	Direct assaults and alleged killings	D/E only
Postmortem/concealment	Burial, relocation, alleged repeated return to remains	Participation in disposal and concealment	D/E only
Network/commerce	Alleged recruitment, customers, transport, trafficking contacts	Alleged facilitation and participation	D/E only
Opportunity anchors	Family vehicles, Twin Falls residence, work/travel corridors	Twin Falls residence, school employment/access	Some anchors potentially record-testable

 

Analytical caution: the paired-role hypothesis comes primarily from one reporting witness whose accounts include dissociative amnesia and later-emerging recollections. It should therefore guide record searches and interviews, not substitute for them.

 

Family and household demographics

The following demographic framework is drawn from the autobiographical “Born Into a Crime Family” material as reproduced or summarized in the reviewed dossier and related short-story/journal materials. Except where an official source is identified, these are submitter-reported background facts or allegations and should be verified independently.

Category	Reported demographic information	Investigative value / verification
Family unit	Robert Stout Shelton and Glenda Ruth Shelton are identified as the submitter’s biological parents. The writings reference multiple sons, including an older brother and a younger brother, and a wider Shelton-family network.	Verify birth, marriage, household, school and census/ directory records; avoid contacting relatives without investigative purpose.
Primary household	4105 Twin Falls Street, Irving, Dallas County, Texas, repeatedly described as the childhood home or “House of Hate.”	Confirm ownership and occupancy dates, parcel boundaries, neighboring addresses, utilities, permits and historical aerials.
Relevant period	The central childhood and cold-case narratives are placed principally in the early through late 1970s; some submissions allege conduct extending into later decades.	Create year-by-year residence, employment and vehicle timeline before case comparison.
Father’s social position	Robert is described as a long-term General Dynamics employee in Fort Worth, an engineer associated with F-16 work, and a holder of a top-secret clearance for more than 20 years.	Verify employer, job title, clearance, work schedules, travel and retirement records. Employment is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Mother’s social position	Glenda is described as spending her career in Irving Independent School District elementary education and retiring from the district; Lee Britain Elementary is repeatedly named.	Verify exact title, campuses, dates, assignments, absences, coworkers and retirement record. Employment is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Economic presentation	The household is portrayed as having stable institutional employment while the submitter describes neglect, abuse and alleged illicit income or family financial support.	Compare legitimate income, property and probate records; do not infer criminal proceeds without transaction evidence.
Vehicles/mobility	Accounts reference family cars, a station wagon, vans and travel between Irving, Fort Worth, Sherman, rural Texas and other locations.	Recover DMV/insurance records and compare vehicle make, color and plate information with archived cases.
Community setting	Twin Falls is described as a residential neighborhood near alleys, a drainage ditch, Thomas Haley Elementary, apartments and routes to Highway 183/DFW-area locations.	Geocode period-accurate street, school, drainage and business locations; use historical rather than present-day maps.
Institutional contacts	Writings allege recurring social contact with an Irving police sergeant and his household, plus school, rural and business associates.	Treat as an associate lead only; verify assignments, addresses, dates and documented contacts before drawing conclusions.
Intergenerational structure	The story characterizes the family as a small, intergenerational hierarchy called the “Shelton Clan,” involving grandparents, relatives and outside associates.	Build a neutral kinship/associate chart separating documented relationship, reported participation, hearsay and unknown status.
Child-witness context	The submitter reports severe childhood abuse, neglect, special-education placement, closed-head injuries, dissociation, depression and anxiety, with memory release beginning in 1997 and first murder recall/reporting in 1999.	Obtain available school, medical and treatment records; evaluate memory source and timing case by case.
Current witness status	The submitter describes being physically disabled, using crutches/walker, homebound or highly mobility-limited, and living with CPTSD and dissociative amnesia.	Use trauma-informed, scheduled, written-first communication and reasonable disability accommodations.

 

Reported intergenerational organization — lead chart

Level	People or institutions described	Reported function	Status
Core dyad	Robert and Glenda Shelton	Household authority; alleged acquisition, violence, concealment and family control	Allegation; subjects profiled separately below
Older generation	Grandparents and other senior relatives mentioned in narratives	Alleged family hierarchy, property/rural access, discipline or facilitation	Relationships partly verifiable; criminal roles unverified
Extended family	Aunts, uncles, cousins and siblings referenced across writings	Alleged support, silence, financial benefit, witness pressure or occasional protection	Do not attribute conduct collectively; test person by person
Outside associates	Named or described police, school, rural, business and social contacts	Alleged customers, facilitators, protectors or witnesses	Unverified; inclusion is not an accusation
Institutions	General Dynamics, Irving ISD/Lee Britain Elementary, local police and other agencies	Opportunity, access or reporting context	Institutional connection must not be treated as institutional complicity

 

Demographic-use rule Demographics should narrow records searches and opportunity windows. They should never be used to infer guilt from occupation, family relationship, neighborhood, class, disability, institutional affiliation or social contact.

 

 

Profile 1 — Robert Stout Shelton

Identity and verifiable anchors

Field	Current entry	Status/source
Full name	Robert Stout Shelton	Name appears in uploaded vital-record and public-record materials
Relationship to submitter	Biological father	Submitter account; consistent across submissions
Deceased status	Reported deceased by submitter	Death certificate not located in reviewed subset; verify
Reported residence	4105 Twin Falls Street, Irving, Texas	Repeated in 2016–2026 submissions; verify deeds/occupancy
Reported occupation	General Dynamics employee; submitter reports engineering/F-16 work and long-term security clearance	Submitter account; verify employer/clearance records
Reported mobility/access	Family vehicles; Texas travel corridors; hunting/property access	Submitter account; verify DMV, licenses, property and travel records

 

Reported conduct pattern

·                     Approach and acquisition: alleged luring, opportunistic selection, blitz attacks, vehicle-assisted abduction, and use of family or institutional familiarity.

·                     Control: alleged beating, restraint, threats, confinement in the home or vehicles, and use of other participants.

·                     Fatal violence: alleged blunt-force assault, strangulation, drowning, and participation in other killings described in victim sheets.

·                     Body handling: alleged grave preparation, backyard burial, remote disposal, relocation of remains, and repeated return to remains.

·                     Sexual/postmortem behavior: materials allege sexual violence and postmortem acts. These are high-value linkage claims but remain uncorroborated.

·                     Network behavior: later writings describe alleged customers, trafficking arrangements, and assistance by relatives or associates. No reviewed record independently establishes an organized network.

Provisional behavioral hypotheses — not diagnoses

Hypothesis	Observed basis in submitted material	How to test
Instrumental plus expressive violence	Accounts combine acquisition/concealment goals with alleged excessive and personalized violence	Compare scene reports, injury patterns, offender statements and disposal behavior across candidate cases
Control through mobility and terrain familiarity	Repeated vehicle use, alleys, drainage areas, wooded locations and property access	Reconstruct vehicles, routes, residences, work travel and hunting/property records
Persistent interest in remains	Repeated allegations of return, movement and interaction with buried victims	Review exhumation disturbance, grave depth/orientation, repeated access opportunity and property changes
Paired-offender facilitation	Accounts portray alternating driver/captor/assault roles with Glenda	Test whether candidate cases require two actors; compare witness reports and vehicle occupancy
Victim access through ordinary trust	Accounts include babysitting, school, directions, work and neighborhood contexts	Identify victim-contact opportunities through school, employer, neighborhood and family records

 

Robert-linked incident clusters in reviewed materials

Cluster / source	Reported victim or setting	Reported Robert connection	Corroboration status
Victim sheets 1043, 1047–1049	Young women/girls; Irving/Old Irving; Twin Falls residence	Capture/transport, assault, burial and postmortem conduct alleged	D only; locate matching records
Victim sheets 1506–1512	Mother and children associated with van/golf-driving-range episode	Blitz assault, vehicle movement, killing/disposal alleged	D only; geography and victim identities unresolved
Three Red-Headed Girls sheets 1–3	Three unidentified red-haired female victims	Participation alleged across abduction/offense/disposal narratives	D only; classification work exists
Boy Scout drainage-ditch request	Approx. 15-year-old boy; Twin Falls/Thomas Haley Elementary vicinity	Luring, beating and drowning alleged	C/D: 2025 coroner-record request; official case not yet identified
4109/Twin Falls child lead	Young blond girl reportedly linked to neighboring residence/backyard	Burial at 4105 Twin Falls alleged	C/D: Texas Ranger letter; needs resident and missing-child identification
Van children / school-ground writings	Multiple unidentified children in vehicles and burial/disposal locations	Participation and movement alleged	D only; counts, dates and jurisdictions uncertain
Creek/rural-network writings	Women/children and alleged associates at rural sites	Preaching, recruitment/commerce and violence alleged	D only; later-emerging narrative requiring strict corroboration

 

 

Robert — investigative indicators and records plan

Priority	Record or test	Purpose
1	Confirm death, complete identity, residences and household composition	Establish temporal availability and legal identity
2	General Dynamics employment, job assignments, schedules, travel and surviving clearance-related records	Test claimed opportunity corridors without assuming criminality
3	Historical DMV registrations, vehicle descriptions, insurance and crash/tow records	Compare vehicles with witness/case records
4	Property deeds, permits, utility work, pools, septic, fences, landscaping and historical aerials for 4105/4109 Twin Falls	Identify disturbance windows and feasible search areas
5	Hunting/fishing licenses, leases, rural property and known associates	Test access to remote disposal sites
6	Archived calls-for-service, incident reports, death investigations and neighborhood complaints	Locate contemporaneous law-enforcement contacts
7	Missing/unidentified/homicide data comparison	Match victim descriptors, dates, injuries and disposal features
8	Evidence review and modern forensic triage	Determine whether DNA, fingerprints, trace or remains can confirm/exclude linkage

 

Assessment boundary No formal clinical diagnosis of Robert Shelton is offered. Terms such as sadism, psychopathy, necrophilia, organized offender, or serial killer should be used only as allegation descriptors or qualified hypotheses unless supported by competent evaluation and case evidence.

 

 

Profile 2 — Glenda Ruth Shelton

Identity and verifiable anchors

Field	Current entry	Status/source
Full name	Glenda Ruth Shelton	Texas certificate of death
Date of birth	July 4, 1938 (OCR reading; verify against certified copy)	Texas certificate of death
Date/place of death	July 1, 2023; Baylor Scott & White Medical Center–Irving	Texas certificate of death
Last residence	4105 Twin Falls, Irving, Texas 75062 (OCR reading; verify certified copy)	Texas certificate of death
Relationship to submitter	Biological mother	Submitter account; consistent across submissions
Reported occupation	Long-term Irving Independent School District elementary-school employee; Lee Britain Elementary alleged	Submitter account; verify personnel/attendance records
Disposition	Cremation reported	Texas certificate of death

 

Reported conduct pattern

·                     Victim selection and access: alleged active participation in identifying victims and use of vehicles, household, neighborhood, restaurant/alley, and school-related opportunity.

·                     Control and assault: alleged restraint, beating, stabbing, sexual violence, intimidation, and severe abuse of the submitter.

·                     Fatal violence: alleged direct participation in multiple killings and joint assaults with Robert.

·                     Concealment: alleged assistance with movement, backyard disposal, grave placement, and suppression of disclosure.

·                     Institutional access: the submitter associates some alleged victims with Glenda’s school employment. This is a testable access hypothesis, not an established connection.

·                     Paired activity: accounts sometimes portray Glenda as driver or initiator and sometimes as acting under encouragement; roles are not consistently hierarchical.

Provisional behavioral hypotheses — not diagnoses

Hypothesis	Observed basis in submitted material	How to test
Active co-offender rather than passive witness	Multiple accounts assign victim selection, driving, restraint and direct violence to Glenda	Seek case facts requiring a female or second offender; compare witness descriptions
Personalized aggression toward female victims	Victim sheets allege face-, breast- and sexualized injury patterns	Compare verified injury patterns; avoid linkage if details first arose after public case facts
Household/institutional access	Allegations repeatedly connect home, neighborhood and elementary-school settings	Reconstruct employment, absences, student/staff disappearances and residence access
Role flexibility within dyad	Accounts alternate initiation, driving, assault and concealment roles	Develop event-by-event role matrix rather than assigning a fixed leader/follower model
Coercive family control	Therapist letter and journals report chronic childhood trauma and suppression	Obtain collateral family, school, medical and child-welfare records where lawful

 

Glenda-linked incident clusters in reviewed materials

Cluster / source	Reported victim or setting	Reported Glenda connection	Corroboration status
Victim sheet 1043	Approx. 18-year-old red-haired restaurant worker	Capture, sexualized assault, killing and burial alleged	D only; locate matching disappearance
Victim sheet 1047	Approx. 18-year-old woman and younger girl in Old Irving account	Driving, vehicle assault and stabbing alleged	D only; matching cases unknown
Victim sheets 1048–1049	Girls/young women associated with Twin Falls narratives	Participation in acquisition, assault and concealment alleged	D only
1506–1512 / van family	Mother and children near Irving golf driving range	Presence/participation appears in broader account set	D only; role requires event-level clarification
School-related allegations	Teacher/employee/mother and children connected in later writings	Access through Lee Britain Elementary alleged	D only; test against personnel and missing-person records
Childhood abuse accounts	Submitter as child	Severe physical, psychological and attempted lethal abuse alleged	B/D: therapist confirms treatment for reported parental trauma, not each event
Rural/trafficking writings	Women and children at alleged rural or network sites	Facilitation, supervision and violence alleged	D only; no independent network proof reviewed

 

 

Glenda — investigative indicators and records plan

Priority	Record or test	Purpose
1	Certified vital record and probate file	Confirm identity, dates, last residence, relatives and estate property
2	Irving ISD employment, assignments, absences, personnel and retirement records	Test institutional access and active periods
3	Lee Britain Elementary staff/student rosters and archived notices	Identify reported missing employee or parent and affected child
4	Historical vehicle/driver and household records	Compare female driver/second-offender possibilities
5	Calls-for-service, school incidents, medical and child-welfare records where lawfully accessible	Test chronic abuse and contemporaneous reporting
6	Property and disturbance records for Twin Falls address	Assess alleged burial/concealment opportunities
7	Missing/unidentified/homicide comparison focused on female and child victims	Test descriptors, injury patterns, last-seen context and geography
8	Collateral interviews conducted by trauma-informed personnel	Separate firsthand observation, hearsay, inference and later reconstruction

 

Assessment boundary No posthumous diagnosis is offered for Glenda Shelton. The available death record establishes identity and death, not criminal conduct. The therapist’s letter supports the existence of reported parental trauma and treatment; it does not independently prove any particular offense.

 

 

Joint subject timeline and geographic anchors

Period	Reported anchor	Allegation category	Verification task
Early–late 1970s	4105 Twin Falls Street, Irving	Home-based violence, burial, neighborhood victims	Ownership/occupancy; aerials; permits; calls; missing-person comparison
1970s	Twin Falls / Thomas Haley Elementary drainage area	Boy Scout homicide/disposal allegation	Locate death investigation, EMS, coroner and police records
1970s	Irving golf driving range / Highway 183 vicinity	Van mother-and-children cluster 1506–1512	Historic business location, roadway map, missing family/vehicle reports
1970s	Old Irving alleys/shops/restaurants	Young female victim clusters 1043, 1047–1049	Archived missing persons, employee rosters and incident reports
School-employment years	Lee Britain Elementary / Irving ISD	Staff/parent/child access allegations	Employment dates, absences, rosters, missing persons
Uncertain periods	Sherman, Weatherford, rural Texas and travel corridors	Rural/trafficking and disposal allegations	Narrow dates; compare residences, travel and case records
2016–2018	FBI/Texas Ranger/Irving submissions	Formal reporting and clinical corroboration of trauma context	Recover intake records, attachments and agency disposition

 

Case-linkage decision matrix

Proposed link	Current support	Major weakness	Minimum next test
Same two subjects across several victim sheets	Recurring Robert/Glenda roles and Twin Falls anchor	Single primary reporting source; later-emerging recollections	Independent case match on victim, date, location, injury or vehicle
Twin Falls as disposal hub	Repeated backyard/grave descriptions	No reviewed excavation or official remains recovery	Non-invasive historical/property review followed by lawful forensic assessment if justified
School access as victim pathway	Glenda employment allegation and repeated school references	No verified missing staff/parent match	Personnel/roster and missing-person comparison
Robert travel/employment corridor	Reported General Dynamics and hunting travel	Employment/travel details unverified	Obtain records and compare only after date ranges are fixed
Paired-offender dynamics	Alternating driver/captor/assault roles	Narrative inconsistency and uncertain chronology	Build incident-by-incident role chart; seek external witness evidence
Organized trafficking network	Repeated later writings about customers/associates	No independent financial, communication or witness corroboration reviewed	Identify named associate/event and test with records before expanding

 

 

Reliability, limitations, and safeguards

What the package can establish

·                     The submitter has made repeated, structured reports over a period of years and created numbered victim sheets, maps, timelines, letters, and records requests.

·                     A treating psychologist documented treatment for PTSD related to reported complex parental trauma and reported witnessing of crimes.

·                     An attorney transmitted the submitter’s information to Texas Rangers in 2017 and represented that counsel did not believe the submission was intended to waste time.

·                     Glenda Ruth Shelton’s death and identity are supported by a Texas death certificate.

·                     Several claims contain concrete, potentially falsifiable details: addresses, schools, approximate ages, injury mechanisms, vehicles, travel routes and alleged burial areas.

What the package cannot presently establish

·                     That either parent committed homicide, trafficking, sexual violence, organized crime, or any other alleged offense.

·                     That any proposed victim sheet corresponds to a real missing or deceased person.

·                     That recurring behavioral details represent offender signature rather than memory reconstruction, repetition across the submitter’s own writings, or another source.

·                     That a serial pattern exists under FBI or legal definitions.

·                     A psychiatric, personality, paraphilic, or forensic diagnosis of either deceased subject.

·                     That alleged associates, institutions, officers, or relatives participated in or concealed crimes.

Interview safeguards requested by the submitter’s records

·                     Use a trauma-informed interviewer experienced with dissociation and complex trauma.

·                     Prefer scheduled written communication before any interview; avoid surprise contact.

·                     Record questions and answers verbatim; distinguish spontaneous recall from responses to prompts.

·                     Avoid leading questions and do not disclose nonpublic case facts before testing independent recall.

·                     Permit breaks and limit session length; document medications, sleep, distress and source exposure relevant to recall.

·                     Corroborate each detail independently and preserve contradictions rather than harmonizing them.

 

Source register reviewed for this profile

Ref.	Document	Date/type	Evidentiary use
S1	FBI book 2016	2016 submission with victim sheets 1043, 1047–1049	Prior report; detailed allegations; D/C
S2	FBI Cover Page 2017 / Texas Dept Intro Letter 2017	2017 transmittal materials	Prior submission history; C
S3	Elisha Hollis letter to Texas Rangers	August 18, 2017 attorney letter	Good-faith/context statement; B/C
S4	Bryanson PTSD letter signed	December 3, 2018 psychologist letter	Treatment and reported-trauma context; B
S5	Cold Case Offense 1506–1512 and timeline	Victim sheets/timeline	Van-family cluster; D
S6	Three Red Headed Girls Combined Victim Sheets	2020-era combined sheets	Three-victim cluster; D
S7	Request for autopsy boyscout 2025	April 15, 2025 records request	Specific boy/vicinity lead; C/D
S8	Texas Ranger Cold Case Dept. letter	Undated/2026 working copy	4109/Twin Falls child lead; C/D
S9	Therapist-question documents	June–July 2025 narratives	Later-emerging recollection and self-reflection; D
S10	A Lot of Lil Things; Glenda/Robert journals; other named journals	2025–2026 narratives	Behavioral themes and additional leads; D
S11	Civil Rights Conflict and Interference Brief	2026 dossier/brief	Consolidated allegations, contacts and investigative history; D/C
S12	Glenda Certificate of Death	Texas vital record issued 2025	Identity, death, residence; A
S13	Robert Stout Shelton birth/open-record materials	Vital/public-record documents	Identity lead only; accuracy must be verified; A/lead
S14	Existing six-chapter dossier and contact spreadsheets	2026 compilation	Indexing and referral context; secondary compilation

 

 

 

 

 

Official analytical references

·                     Federal Bureau of Investigation. Behavioral Analysis. https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-investigate/behavioral-analysis

·                     Federal Bureau of Investigation. Criminal Investigative Analysis: Practitioner Perspectives, Part One. Requests for NCAVC services are routed through a local FBI field office. https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/criminal-investigative-analysis-practitioner-perspectives-part-one-of-four

·                     Federal Bureau of Investigation. Serial Murder: Pathways for Investigations. https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/reports-and-publications/serialmurder-pathwaysforinvestigations.pdf/view

·                     National Institute of Justice. National Best Practices for Implementing and Sustaining a Cold Case Investigation Unit. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/252016.pdf

·                     Federal Bureau of Investigation. Submit a Tip. https://www.fbi.gov/tips

 

Requested disposition and contact preferences

Requested disposition: retain the submission; assign an intake/reference number; identify the responsible jurisdiction(s); advise whether an agency will conduct a records comparison; and, if an active investigation is opened, consider ViCAP entry or NCAVC consultation through law-enforcement channels.

Materials recommended for staged submission

·                     Stage 1: this profile, one-page cover letter, therapist letter, attorney letter, and index of victim sheets.

·                     Stage 2: numbered victim sheets and maps, grouped by location and date range.

·                     Stage 3: correspondence/receipts showing prior submissions and agency responses.

·                     Stage 4: longer journals only when requested or when a specific passage supplies a testable detail.

·                     Do not initially transmit unrelated medical, identity, financial, or family photographs unless requested and relevant.

Submitter accommodation notice The reviewed materials state that Brian “Happy” Bryanson is homebound/physically limited and experiences CPTSD with dissociative symptoms. He requests written/email communication, scheduled contact, trauma-informed handling, and no unannounced visit. Confirm current contact information before submission; it is intentionally omitted from this shareable profile copy.

 

END OF PROFILE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BRIAN “HAPPY” BRYANSON | EVIDENCE DOSSIER

EVIDENCE DOSSIER

Brian “Happy” Bryanson

Disability • Professional History • Identity Continuity • Advocacy and Civil-Rights Record

CONFIDENTIAL — CONTAINS SENSITIVE HEALTH AND LEGAL INFORMATION

Prepared July 19^th, 2026, | Organizational summary of records supplied by the subject

Purpose: to help a professional recipient understand the documentary record efficiently. This dossier does not replace the original records, establish the truth of disputed allegations, or provide a medical or legal diagnosis.

Page

BRIAN “HAPPY” BRYANSON | EVIDENCE DOSSIER

Document Map

Section	Contents
1	Purpose, scope, and evidentiary boundaries
2	Executive profile
3	Documented chronology
4	Disability and functional evidence
5	Treatment continuity and clinical observations
6	Professional qualifications and continuing education
7	Identity, legal continuity, and public records
8	Cold-case advocacy and civil-rights submissions
9	Personal, relational, and visual context
10	Recipient roles and recommended review path
11	Exhibit register and duplicate-control log

Privacy and handling notice

Restricted handling. The source collection includes health information, therapy notes, government identifiers, financial records, vital records, photographs, and third-party communications. The dossier intentionally omits full Social Security, driver-license, insurance-member, account, and similar identifiers. Distribute only to recipients with a legitimate need to review it.

How to read this dossier

“Documented” means a supplied record contains the stated information; it does not mean every underlying event has been independently verified.

Clinical records document symptoms, treatment, and reported experiences. They do not independently prove alleged crimes described during treatment.

Cold-case and civil-rights materials contain allegations and interpretations submitted for investigation. They are labeled accordingly.

The original source files—not this summary—should be used when authenticity, signatures, exact wording, or evidentiary admissibility matters.

1. Purpose, scope, and evidentiary boundaries

This dossier organizes a mixed record concerning Brian “Happy” Bryanson’s identity, disability, treatment, professional history, family-record research, cold-case advocacy, and civil-rights complaints. It is designed as an intake and orientation document for attorneys, investigators, clinicians, disability reviewers, academic evaluators, or other authorized recipients.

Collection reviewed	135 uploaded files totaling approximately 151 MB.
Unique file contents	118 unique byte-level contents after exact-duplicate review.
Large record sets	Two medical-record batches total more than 250 pages; additional therapy notes, legal records, certificates, images, and correspondence were supplied.
Duplicate control	Exact duplicates and obvious “Copy” versions are indexed once. Alternate formats are noted when materially useful.
Excluded as unusable	Two zero-byte certificate files and a shortcut file that contains no substantive record.
Summary method	Facts were extracted from readable text and visible records. No external authentication or independent fact investigation was performed.

Evidence classes used

Class	Meaning
A — Primary/official	Court orders, government records, licenses, benefit records, vital records.
B — Professional/clinical	Signed clinician letters, therapy notes, service confirmations, neuropsychological and disability materials.
C — Subject-authored	Briefs, complaints, victim sheets, requests, and narratives prepared or submitted by Bryanson.
D — Contextual	Photographs, artwork, text-message screenshots, account-recovery images, and correspondence.
E — Duplicate/administrative	Exact duplicate, alternate format, empty file, shortcut, or transmittal record.

2. Executive profile

The supplied record presents a person with a long professional and helping identity whose functioning has also been significantly affected by physical, neurocognitive, learning, and trauma-related disabilities. The materials show both meaningful strengths and substantial limitations; neither a simple “high functioning” nor a simple “incapacitated” description captures the record.

Legal identity	A 2016 Collin County order changed the name Brian Joseph Bryanson to Brian Happy Joseph Bryanson. Attorney correspondence confirms the requested use of “Happy Bryanson.”
Professional identity	Texas social-work licensing material and continuing-education certificates document professional social-work training and ongoing education.
Disability record	A signed 2018 psychologist letter identifies physical, neurocognitive, and mental-health disabilities and recommends workplace accommodations.
Trauma treatment	Psychologist and later crime-victim counseling records document PTSD/complex-trauma treatment, anxiety, depression, panic symptoms, flashbacks, and trauma-informed care.
Functional trajectory	The 2018 record describes successful full-time employment with accommodations. A 2020 attorney letter describes difficulty finding work amid worsening physical and PTSD-related limitations. Later records document disability-benefit and service processes.
Advocacy identity	Subject-authored cold-case, victim-information, autopsy-request, FBI, and civil-rights materials seek investigation, evidence preservation, outside review, and identification or recovery of alleged victims.
Creative and relational context	Photographs and artwork show a strong “Happy” identity, community connection, visual storytelling, and trauma-focused advocacy themes.

Documented strengths

Empathy, compassion, and sustained investment in helping relationships, as described in the psychologist’s letter.

Vocabulary knowledge, categorical organization, and general funds of information identified as neurocognitive strengths.

Ability to self-advocate and use learned coping tools, including grounding, distraction, and delayed processing.

Persistence in maintaining records, seeking services, completing professional education, and submitting advocacy materials.

Ongoing relationships and community ties are visible in clinical notes and photographs.

3. Documented chronology

Period	Documented development	Class
2016	Court order grants adult name change; attorney confirmation directs use of Brian Happy Joseph Bryanson / Happy Bryanson.	A
2017	A later psychologist letter reports review of a 2017 neuropsychological evaluation.	B
2018	Psychologist documents physical, neurocognitive, and mental-health disabilities and detailed workplace accommodations. A separate letter to Irving Police confirms PTSD treatment and reports that cold-case information had been supplied to Irving Police and the Texas Rangers.	B
2019–2020	Attorney disability letter describes employment loss, difficulty finding work, impaired walking/standing, and debilitating PTSD flashbacks. Therapy records from April–May 2020 document posttraumatic-stress treatment, crutch use, sleep disruption, panic, cognitive interference, financial stress, and coping work.	B
2020	Disability appeal and related benefit records document pursuit of disability benefits.	A/B
2021–2023	Tax and professional records; multiple social-work continuing-education certificates completed in 2023.	A/B
2025	Life Connections confirms crime-victim counseling and trauma-informed care beginning February 5, 2025, with consistent and steady progress. Additional identity, court, vital-record, Treasury, medical-record, and public-record correspondence is preserved.	A/B
2026	AssuraSource medical-record correspondence and large record batches; disability and neuropsychological materials; FBI color-of-law complaint; civil-rights conflict/interference brief; open-records and advocacy materials.	B/C

4. Disability and functional evidence

2018 psychologist accommodation findings

Erica R. Crawford, PsyD, described physical, neurocognitive, and mental-health disabilities and stated that Bryanson was then able to maintain full-time employment with support and accommodations. The letter links neurocognitive deficits to likely childhood TBIs and identifies PTSD related to complex childhood trauma.

Domain	Documented limitation	Recommended support
Reading/visual processing	Specific learning disability affecting reading accuracy and rapid interpretation of written symbols; comprehension worsens under time pressure or interruption.	Capital letters when helpful; extended reading time; early notice of deadlines; uninterrupted work time or reduced caseload.
Mathematics	Weak math accuracy and poor math fluency.	Calculator use; extended time and rechecking.
Grip/hand endurance	Below-average grip strength with fatigue and dropping risk.	Reduce handwriting; use electronic records, dictation, recording, agendas, and meeting notes.
Memory/attention	Difficulty initially encoding verbal information, multitasking, resuming after interruption, and filtering auditory distractions; recall improves after processing time.	Advance notice; delayed response time; low-distraction settings; later completion of notes.
PTSD	Symptoms described as stable at that time but potentially triggerable and intermittently work-interfering.	Open communication, clear expectations, regular feedback, conflict procedures, and flexible individualized accommodations.

 

 

 

 

Neuropsychological pattern

A supplied hand-annotated score profile depicts substantial scatter across cognitive domains, with relative verbal/knowledge strengths and lower results in several visual, speed, memory, motor, and executive tasks. Because the chart abbreviations and underlying report are incomplete in the visible image, this dossier does not assign diagnoses or convert the plotted scores into clinical conclusions.

Interpretive caution: A qualified neuropsychologist should interpret the full report, norms, validity measures, medical history, and functional observations. Score scatter alone is not a diagnosis.

Functional change documented in 2020

An attorney reported persistent job-seeking but inability to secure employment, difficulty walking and standing, and debilitating stress during PTSD flashbacks.

Therapy notes document use of crutches, pain, disrupted sleep, panic attacks, financial and housing fears, and reduced perceived functioning.

A May 22, 2020, note records that flashbacks compounded the learning disability, word retrieval, speech organization, and cognitive stamina.

The records describe coping capacity alongside impairment: grounding, attention to present sensations, calming tools, distraction, and delayed processing.

5. Treatment continuity and clinical observations

The supplied clinical record establishes treatment continuity across different periods and providers. It also demonstrates why clinical corroboration must be stated carefully: providers document symptoms and reports received in treatment, not independent proof of every historical event described by the patient.

Period	Provider/source	What the record documents
2018	Crawford Psychology	Signed ADA/accommodation letter; PTSD and complex-trauma treatment; strengths, limitations, and workplace supports.
Dec. 2018	Crawford Psychology	Letter to Irving Police confirms psychotherapy for PTSD, transmission of cold-case information, fear of family retaliation, and concern that investigative contact could destabilize symptoms.
Apr.–May 2020	Crawford Psychology	Weekly progress notes and attached handwritten materials addressing posttraumatic stress, flashbacks, dreams, pain, panic, sleep, disability process, relationships, coping, and advocacy.
Feb.–July 2025 and after	Life Connections Crime Victim Counseling Program	Attendance and participation in trauma-informed counseling; anxiety, depression, complex trauma; compliance with recommendations; consistent and steady progress.

Historical risk-related notation

A May 8, 2020 progress note records increased panic and passive death-oriented thoughts described by Bryanson as not wanting to kill himself but feeling “ready” to die. The same note documents coping tools and clinical processing. This is a historical notation, not a current risk assessment. Any present safety concern requires direct contemporary assessment by a qualified professional or emergency service.

6. Professional qualifications and continuing education

The collection includes a Texas social-work license card and certificates from CEU Creations, CE4Less, and Continued Social Work. The pictured license carries an older expiration date; current licensure status should be verified directly with the Texas licensing authority before being represented as active.

Competency area	Documented coursework
Crisis and de-escalation	Verbal and Emotional De-escalation; Advising People on Using 988 Versus 911.
Ethics and technology	Ethics and Boundary Issues; Ethics and Telemental Health; Social Work in the Digital Age—Ethics and Risk Management.
Trauma and violence	Collective Trauma and Building a Trauma-Informed Culture; Domestic Violence; Intimate Partner Violence in Diverse Groups; Prevention of Domestic Violence.
Children and youth	Mandated Reporting of Child Abuse; Supporting and Affirming LGBTQI+ Youth; Evidence-Based Treatment for Social Anxiety in Teens; Working with Generation Z.
Clinical practice	Mindfulness Interventions; Supervision for Mental Health Professionals; Balance Over Burnout.
Equity and social justice	EDI and Anti-Racist Social Work Practice and Education.

7. Identity, legal continuity, and public records

The record contains multiple independent types of documentation that connect the subject’s former and current names and provide continuity across legal, professional, benefit, tax, and account records.

Record group	Evidence supplied	Handling/interpretive note
Name change	2016 Collin County order and attorney correspondence.	Use current legal name; retain former name only as necessary for record matching.
Professional identity	Texas social-work license image and CE certificates.	Verify current license status independently.
Benefits/disability	Social Security verification, appeal receipt, disability-date/claim materials.	Use unredacted originals only through secure channels.
Identity documents	Driver-license, Social Security, insurance/member-card and account-recovery materials.	Do not circulate in general packets; redact identifiers.
Financial continuity	Tax return, savings-bond records, and Treasury reissue package.	Relevant to name continuity and administrative history; restrict financial data.
Family/vital records	Glenda Shelton death records; Robert Stout Shelton birth/vital-statistics/open-records correspondence; Rose Lichorobiec and DSHS correspondence.	These documents are record-seeking and family-history reconstruction; they do not prove unrelated alleged conduct.

 

8. Cold-case advocacy and civil-rights submissions

The collection contains subject-authored and submitted materials concerning alleged historical crimes, missing or unidentified victims, official interference, conflicts of interest, and requests for outside review. These documents are important evidence of what Bryanson reported and requested, when preserved with dates and transmission records. They are not by themselves proof that the underlying allegations occurred.

Material	Documented purpose	Evidentiary treatment
Three Red Headed Girls victim sheets	Three structured one-page sheets describing alleged victims, events, injuries, and disposal.	C — allegation/recollection requiring corroboration.
Boy Scout autopsy request	Request seeking review or autopsy-related action concerning an alleged Boy Scout victim.	C — advocacy request; verifying victim identity and jurisdiction.
FBI color-of-law complaint	Fourteen-page complaint file supplied in image-based form.	C — formal submission/allegation; retain receipt or case number if available.
Civil Rights Conflict and Interference Brief	Requests recusal, evidence preservation, and independent review; explicitly labels allegations as unverified.	C — legal/advocacy theory, not adjudicated fact.
2018 psychologist letter to Irving Police	Confirms that cold-case information was supplied to Irving Police and the Texas Rangers and records fear of retaliation.	B — corroborates reporting and clinical context, not the crimes.
Public/vital-record correspondence	Requests and replies concerning family and government records.	A/D — corroborates research activity and agency contact.

Recommended allegation framework

State each item as “Bryanson reports,” “Bryanson recalls,” or “the submitted complaint alleges” unless independently corroborated.

Separate firsthand sensory recollection from later inference, theory, hearsay, and records obtained from agencies.

Attach dates, recipients, delivery confirmations, case numbers, and agency responses to establish the reporting trail.

Request preservation of dispatch logs, missing-person files, property records, personnel records, archival maps, and other time-specific evidence without representing that they will prove the claim.

Use an independent investigator or counsel to assess conflicts, limitations periods, jurisdiction, and corroboration strategy.

 

 

 

 

9. Personal, relational, and visual context

Personal photographs, artwork, communications, journals, poems, and reflective narratives add context but should not be treated as substitutes for medical, legal, or investigative evidence.

Context item	What is visible	Limit
Personal/group photographs	Show Bryanson with groups of younger adults and friends in home and community settings.	Support relational and community context; obtain consent before public use of identifiable third parties.
“Dr. Happy” caricature and “Happy” artwork	Reflect humor, warmth, helping identity, and a longstanding visual brand.	Useful for biographical context, not proof of professional status.
“House of Hate” artwork	Symbolic representation of childhood danger and trauma themes.	Treat as expressive artwork, not a literal crime-scene depiction.
Text-message screenshots	Show a person identified as Heidi expressing distress about possible separation and asking for continued contact.	Incomplete conversation; do not infer the full relationship or circumstances.
Poems, journals, and reflective narratives	Describe trauma, identity, grief, memory, alleged victims, advocacy, and the search for meaning in the author’s own voice.	Treat as creative testimony and evidence of what the author expressed—not independent proof of the events described.
Account-recovery photograph	Shows Bryanson holding a dated identity statement and identification.	Identity-continuity support; redact identification details before sharing.

10. Recipient roles and recommended review path

A recipient can help most effectively by staying within role, preserving the distinction between documented impairment and disputed historical allegations, and identifying the next verifiable step.

Recipient	Useful role
Attorney/civil-rights counsel	Assess conflicts, color-of-law theory, preservation demands, statutes, jurisdiction, privacy, and safe submission strategy.
Independent investigator	Build an allegation matrix; identify corroborating witnesses and records; verify dates, addresses, agencies, and case identifiers.
Disability reviewer	Evaluate longitudinal functional change, accommodations, treatment continuity, objective testing, physical restrictions, and current capacity.
Clinician/neuropsychologist	Interpret complete testing; distinguish developmental learning disability, acquired injury, trauma effects, medication, sleep, pain, and current functioning.
Academic reviewer	Evaluate the case as lived-experience scholarship only with informed consent, privacy safeguards, and separation of research questions from unverified criminal claims.
Advocacy/media recipient	Protect third-party privacy; avoid publishing identifiers or accusations as established fact; seek independent corroboration and legal review.

Recommended sequence

Secure the unredacted source archive and create a read-only master copy.

Prepare a one-page recipient-specific cover letter stating the exact request.

Use the exhibit register to send only records relevant to that recipient.

For cold-case matters, create a claim-by-claim corroboration matrix with source, date, location, firsthand/inference status, and possible independent evidence.

For disability or academic matters, obtain updated medical and neuropsychological opinions focused on current functional limitations and requested accommodations.

Record every submission, recipient, date, delivery proof, response, and next action.

11. Exhibit register and duplicate-control log

The register inventories filenames are supplied in this workspace. “Unique source” means unique file bytes, not necessarily unique substantive content. Alternate scans or Word/PDF versions can contain the same record with different bytes. Filenames are preserved to support retrieval.

Inventory summary: 135 files; 118 unique byte-level contents; exact duplicates, alternate formats, two empty files, and one shortcut identified.

Exhibit A — Clinical/disability

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	Bryanson ADA letter electronically signed.pdf	Exact duplicate of Bryanson ADA letter electronically signed (1).pdf
2	Bryanson PTSD letter signed.docx	Unique source
3	Bryanson PTSD letter signed.pdf	Unique source
4	BryansonH 2020 04 24 handwritten note (1).pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 04 24 handwritten note (1) - Copy.pdf
5	BryansonH 2020 04 24 session note (1).pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 04 24 session note (1) - Copy.pdf
6	BryansonH 2020 05 01 handwritten note (1).pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 05 01 handwritten note (1) - Copy.pdf
7	BryansonH 2020 05 01 session note (3).pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 05 01 session note (3) - Copy.pdf
8	BryansonH 2020 05 08 handwritten note (1).pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 05 08 handwritten note (1) - Copy.pdf
9	BryansonH 2020 05 08 session note (1).pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 05 08 session note (1) - Copy.pdf
10	BryansonH 2020 05 15 handwritten note.pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 05 15 handwritten note - Copy.pdf
11	BryansonH 2020 05 15 session note.pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 05 15 session note - Copy.pdf
12	BryansonH 2020 05 22 handwritten note.pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 05 22 handwritten note - Copy.pdf
13	BryansonH 2020 05 22 session note.pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonH 2020 05 22 session note - Copy.pdf
14	BryansonLetterDisability (1).docx	Unique source
15	BryansonLetterDisability (1).pdf	Unique source
16	BryansonLetterDisability (2).pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonLetterDisability (1).pdf
17	BryansonLetterDisability.docx	Unique source
18	BryansonLetterDisability.pdf	Exact duplicate of BryansonLetterDisability (1).pdf
19	Confirmation of Services Bryanson, Happy 7.22.25.pdf	Exact duplicate of Confirmation of Services Bryanson, Happy 7.22.25 (1).pdf
20	Disability date and claim 2026.pdf	Unique source
21	Disability testing (second).docx	Unique source
22	Email Assurasource_created-2-9-2026_64781411.pdf	Unique source
23	Gmail - Assurasource_Medical Records.pdf	Unique source
24	Gmail - Life Connections Letter.pdf	Unique source
25	Home application 2026.pdf	Unique source
26	LD Neuropsych Testing.jpg	Unique source
27	LD testing 1 of 2 2026.zip	Unique source
28	LD Testing 2 fo 2 2026.zip	Unique source

Exhibit B — Professional CE

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	1238105 (1).pdf	Unique source
2	1238105 (10).pdf	Unique source
3	1238105 (11).pdf	Unique source
4	1238105 (2).pdf	Unique source
5	1238105 (4).pdf	Unique source
6	1238105 (5).pdf	Unique source
7	1238105 (6).pdf	Unique source
8	1238105 (7).pdf	Unique source
9	brian bryanson - ODL 200_ Verbal and Emotional De-escalation - ODL 200_ Certificate Verbal and Emotional De-escalation - CEU Creations.pdf	Unique source
10	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-Advising-People-On-Using-988-Versus-911-Practical-Approaches-For-Healthcare-Providers-E289-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Unique source
11	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-Ethics-and-Boundary-Issues-E097J-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Unique source
12	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-Ethics-and-Telemental-Health-E244B-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Unique source
13	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-Evidence-and-Action-to-Support-and-Affirm-LGBTQI-Youth-E291-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Unique source
14	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-Identification-and-Mandated-Reporting-of-Child-Abuse-The-Pennsylvania-State-Requirement-LEG0001-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Unique source
15	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-Intimate-Partner-Violence-in-Culturally-Diverse-Groups-and-Special-Populations-E2238-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Unique source
16	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-Issues-in-Domestic-Violence-Prevention-of-Domestic-Violence-E114B-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Unique source
17	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-Mindfulness-Interventions-in-Clinical-Practice-E284-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Unique source
18	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-Supervision-A-Guide-for-Mental-Health-Professionals-E068C-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Unique source
19	Glenda Certificate of Death.pdf	Unique source
20	Glenda Shelton Certificate of Death 2025.pdf	Unique source
21	Glendas Death Certificate 2025.docx	Unique source
22	Glendas Death Certificate 2025.pdf	Unique source
23	Robert Stout Shelton Birth Certificate 2025.pdf	Unique source

Exhibit C — Identity/legal/financial

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	Account Recovery.jpg	Unique source
2	Appeals Receipt_For_brian_bryanson.pdf	Unique source
3	BenefitVerificationLetter SSA.action	Unique source
4	Bryanson 2021 Return (1).pdf	Unique source
5	Happy's social security card and Drivers License 2025.pdf	Unique source
6	Name Change to Bryanson.pdf	Unique source
7	Saving bonds in wrong name 2 2025.pdf	Unique source
8	Savings bonds in wrong name 1 2025.pdf	Unique source
9	Scan125.jpg	Unique source
10	Scan126.jpg	Unique source
11	Scan127.jpg	Unique source
12	Treasury_Bond_Reissue_Package 2025.docx	Unique source

Exhibit D — Family/public records

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	Jayme Hanshaw DSHS 2025.pdf	Unique source
2	Open Records Robert Shelton 2026.pdf	Unique source
3	Robert Stout Shelton Vital Statistics letter 2025.pdf	Unique source
4	Robert Stout Shelton vital Stats Letter 2025.pdf	Unique source
5	Rose Lichorobiec VITAL Records 2025.pdf	Unique source
6	Texas Department of State Health Services Email Reply 2025.pdf	Unique source

Exhibit E — Advocacy/cold case

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	Civil_Rights_Conflict_and_Interference_Brief.docx 2026.docx	Unique source
2	FBI color of law complaint 2026.pdf	Unique source
3	Pasted text(27).txt	Unique source
4	Pasted text(28).txt	Unique source
5	Request for autopsy boy scout 2025.docx	Unique source
6	Three red headed girls 1 of 3 WORD VICTIM SHEET 2020.docx	Unique source
7	Three red headed girls 2 of 3 WORD VICTIM SHEET 2020 (1).docx	Unique source
8	Three red headed girls 3 of 3 WORD VICTIM SHEET 2020.docx	Unique source
9	Three Red Headed Girls Combined Victim Sheets(1).docx	Unique source

Exhibit F — Journals/creative testimony

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	A BREAKTHROUGH IN GLENDA FLASHBACKS.docx	Unique source
2	A JOB WELL DONE.docx	Unique source
3	A LOT OF LIL THINGS.docx	Unique source
4	AAA EMPTY JOURNAL TEMPLATE 2026.docx	Unique source
5	AFTERMATH OF THE LAST SET OF FLASHBACKS.docx	Unique source
6	AN ELEVATOR RIDE.docx	Unique source
7	APOLOGY LETTER to the lady missing a lip 2025.docx	Unique source
8	AS IF PTSD IS NOT ENOUGH TO DEAL WITH.docx	Unique source
9	DISABILITY HAS BEGUN TO PAY.docx	Unique source
10	DOUBLE HELIX OF INFINITY.docx	Unique source
11	FIRST SESSION WITH Nick P. Patras PhD.docx	Unique source
12	FROM A DISTANT SHORE A SAVIOR ARRIVED 2025.docx	Unique source
13	GAME OF GAMES.docx	Unique source
14	GLENDA AND HER PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE.docx	Unique source
15	GOOD BYE SKINNY RED HEAD GIRL 2025.docx	Unique source
16	HATE MY POETRY HATE MY LIFE 2025.docx	Unique source
17	HOW DID THE VICE MANAGE HIS CRAVINGS.docx	Unique source
18	HOW MANY PERVERTS KNEW MY NAME.docx	Unique source
19	I GOT PURGATORY FOR THEIR SIN.docx	Unique source
20	I MUST ENDURE THE FALSITIES.docx	Unique source
21	LIVE THE LIE OR DIE.docx	Unique source
22	PAIN FINDS ME AGAIN AND AGAIN.docx	Unique source
23	ROBERT PREACHING AT THE CREEK 2026.docx	Unique source
24	STRANGE WAY TO FIND JUSTICE.docx	Unique source
25	WHEN YOU LOOK AT ME WHAT DO YOU SEE 2025.docx	Unique source
26	WILL THE VAN CHILDREN EVER BE FOUND 2025.docx	Unique source

Exhibit G — Photo/context

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	4f9d7ab7-861d-47bc-bd36-894ab97862ec.png	Unique source
2	9b5d4796-1811-46ff-b3a8-d935207d1b71.png	Unique source
3	house of hate in a neighborhood 2025.png	Unique source
4	IMG_2314.JPG	Unique source
5	IMG_5601 (1).JPG	Unique source
6	IMG_5601 B(1).jpg	Unique source
7	IMG_5720.JPG	Unique source
8	IMG_6410.JPG	Unique source
9	IMG_6414.JPG	Unique source
10	IMG_6559.JPG	Unique source

 

 

Exhibit H — Other/supporting

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	2020-08-27_230712.pdf	Unique source
2	Court paperwork for Bryanson 2025.pdf	Unique source
3	email to the catholic priests of Greenville TX 2026.pdf	Unique source
4	TN_Batch-of-Documents_created-8-19-2025_58183909 (1) (1).pdf	Unique source
5	TN_Batch-of-Documents_created-8-19-2025_58183909 (1).pdf	Exact duplicate of TN_Batch-of-Documents_created-8-19-2025_58183909 (1) (1).pdf

Exhibit I — Duplicate/alternate

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	Bryanson ADA letter electronically signed (1).pdf	Unique source
2	BryansonH 2020 04 24 handwritten note (1) - Copy.pdf	Unique source
3	BryansonH 2020 04 24 session note (1) - Copy.pdf	Unique source
4	BryansonH 2020 05 01 handwritten note (1) - Copy.pdf	Unique source
5	BryansonH 2020 05 01 session note (3) - Copy.pdf	Unique source
6	BryansonH 2020 05 08 handwritten note (1) - Copy.pdf	Unique source
7	BryansonH 2020 05 08 session note (1) - Copy.pdf	Unique source
8	BryansonH 2020 05 15 handwritten note - Copy.pdf	Unique source
9	BryansonH 2020 05 15 session note - Copy.pdf	Unique source
10	BryansonH 2020 05 22 handwritten note - Copy.pdf	Unique source
11	BryansonH 2020 05 22 session note - Copy.pdf	Unique source
12	Confirmation of Services Bryanson, Happy 7.22.25 (1).pdf	Unique source
13	Confirmation of Services Bryanson, Happy 7.22.25 (2).pdf	Exact duplicate of Confirmation of Services Bryanson, Happy 7.22.25 (1).pdf
14	OneNote - Copy.lnk	Shortcut; no substantive content reviewed

Exhibit J — Unusable/empty

No.	Source filename	Control status
1	1238105 (3).pdf	Empty file
2	brianhappybryanson@gmail.com-T034B-Test-CE4Less-Certificate-of-Completion-CE4Less.pdf	Empty file

Closing note

This dossier is an organizational aid. It should travel with the relevant original source files selected for the recipient’s role. Before external distribution, review the packet for current accuracy, remove unrelated third-party information, and use secure transmission for any unredacted health, identity, financial, or vital record.

 

 

 

SIX-CHAPTER DOSSIER

Personal History • Disability • Victim Sheets • Submissions • Emails • Civil Rights

Brian “Happy” Bryanson  |  CPTSD Cold Case Texas

PREPARED JULY 19, 2026

CONFIDENTIAL — CONTAINS SENSITIVE HEALTH, FAMILY, AND UNVERIFIED CRIME ALLEGATIONS

An organizational and investigative-intake aid based on records supplied by Brian Bryanson. It is not a finding of fact, police report, sworn affidavit, medical diagnosis, or legal opinion.

 

Reader orientation and evidentiary boundaries

This dossier is organized in the six chapters requested by Brian “Happy” Bryanson. It separates his personal account from professional disability documentation, original cold-case work products, administrative proof of outreach, email communications, and a civil-rights complaint concerning reported interference by a second cousin employed by the Irving Police Department.

Essential distinction. The organized-crime, trafficking, homicide, corruption, obstruction, and family-conduct narratives are allegations and remembered accounts supplied by Bryanson. Their inclusion records what he has reported and how he has pursued review; it does not establish that the events occurred or that any named person committed a crime.

Chapter	Subject	Primary evidentiary character
1	Personal past and how Bryanson came to understand his childhood as connected to an known organized-crime ring and sale or trafficking of victims	First-person account, later recollections, journals, complaints, and advocacy writing
2	Disabilities, functional decline, mobility limits, homebound status, treatment, and accommodations	Clinician letters, therapy/service records, neuropsychological materials, disability records, plus current self-report
3	Victim sheets, cold-case classifications, timelines, location register, and map control	Subject-authored investigative worksheets and exhibits
4	Mailings, receipts, contact tracking, and administrative status	Mailing spreadsheet, letters, receipts, confirmations, and submission logs
5	Email communications	Supplied Gmail/PDF correspondence and agency/provider communications
6	Reported civil-rights violations and interference by Bryanson’s second cousin	Subject-authored complaint and brief; legal issues require counsel and independent review

 

Chapter 1 — Personal history and the alleged organized-crime environment

Bryanson’s account is that he grew up in a severely abusive family environment and, through later flashbacks, recovered recollections, family statements, and years of writing, came to know that his parents and associates participated in an organized criminal network. He reports that the alleged activity included abduction, sexual exploitation, sale or trafficking of victims, homicide, concealment of bodies, and efforts to prevent investigation. These are his allegations and interpretations, not independently established findings.

How Bryanson says this understanding developed

·                     He reports childhood exposure to severe abuse and events he could not safely process or openly discuss at the time.

·                     He describes complex PTSD with dissociative amnesia and later flashbacks that returned as sensory fragments, scenes, dreams, bodily reactions, and gradually organized narratives.

·                     He began journaling and working with therapists to preserve the material, identify triggers, and separate recalled content from present-day processing.

·                     He converted recurring material into timelines, victim sheets, location descriptions, cold-case classifications, requests for records, and submissions to law-enforcement and outside organizations.

·                     He came to characterize the family environment as an intergenerational organized-crime ring and alleges that victims were sexually exploited or sold. No supplied official finding confirms that characterization.

·                     His stated purpose is to identify victims, locate existing cold-case or unidentified-decedent records, return remains to families when possible, preserve evidence, and obtain independent review before he dies.

 

 

 

 

 

Contemporaneous framing in the supplied records

Record	What it documents
FBI book 2016	Bryanson described PTSD, dissociative symptoms, recent flashbacks, physical stress during writing, fear of destabilization, and a desire to help victims’ families obtain information or justice.
2017 Texas Rangers introduction	He stated that he was reporting a remembered violent event in hopes it could be matched to a cold case and supplied journal entries, victim sheets, and a timeline.
2017 attorney letter	Attorney Elisha Hollis confirmed representation and stated that Bryanson was providing information he believed might link to missing-person cold cases; contact was requested through counsel.
2018 psychologist letter to Irving Police	The psychologist confirmed PTSD treatment, reported that cold-case information had been supplied to Irving Police and Texas Rangers, and warned that premature family contact could destabilize Bryanson and create fear of retaliation.
2025–2026 writings and complaints	Bryanson continued describing childhood crime allegations, family conflict, cold-case advocacy, victim-sheet development, and concern over how agencies handled the reports.

Reading caution. A trauma narrative, clinical history, or flashback record can document distress and the fact that a report was made. It does not independently prove the reported crime. Investigators should seek pre-existing records and non-leading corroboration.

Source group for Chapter 1

FBI book 2016; Texas Dept Intro Letter 2017; ELISHA HOLLIS 2017; Bryanson PTSD letter signed; therapy notes and journals; Pasted text summaries; personal narratives; Civil Rights Conflict and Interference Brief; FBI color-of-law complaint.

 

Chapter 2 — Disabilities, functional decline, and current homebound status

The supplied record documents physical, neurocognitive, learning, and trauma-related disabilities. Bryanson now reports that he is homebound. The records support substantial mobility and functional limitations, but this dossier distinguishes that current self-description from a formal medical certification of “homebound” status, which was not located in readable form among the supplied records.

Documented disability evidence

Domain	Supplied evidence	Functional significance
Physical and mobility	2018 psychologist letter notes physical disabilities and chronic pain; 2020 attorney letter describes difficulty walking and standing; therapy records document crutch use and pain.	Travel, standing, walking, stamina, and in-person appointments may be difficult.
Neurocognitive/learning	2018 ADA letter references educational and 2017 neuropsychological evaluations, likely childhood TBIs, reading and math weaknesses, encoding/attention difficulty, distractibility, grip fatigue, and processing needs.	Written intake, additional time, low-distraction communication, calculators, electronic records, and delayed response may be needed.
Complex trauma/PTSD	Psychologist and counseling records document PTSD/complex trauma, flashbacks, panic, derealization, insomnia, mood instability, anxiety and depression.	Investigative contact may trigger destabilization; trauma-informed interviewing and predictable written communication are important.
Employment/disability trajectory	In 2018 he could work full time with accommodations. By 2020 his attorney linked unemployment and disability-benefit need to mental and physical health. Later benefit and service records document continuing disability processes.	The record shows change over time; earlier employment does not negate later decline.
Current homebound statement	Bryanson states in 2026 that he is now homebound. A “Home application 2026” file is supplied but is scanned and not treated here as an independently verified clinical homebound certification.	Recipients should offer remote, written, or in-home accommodation and request formal certification only when legally necessary.

Accommodations relevant to every chapter

·                     Use written communication as the default and identify one consistent contact person.

·                     Send questions in advance; allow extra processing time and later corrections.

·                     Avoid surprise calls or unannounced visits; schedule remote contact when possible.

·                     Use plain language, short sections, headings, and a written recap of decisions and next steps.

·                     Permit breaks, a support person or counsel, and delayed follow-up when symptoms intensify.

·                     Do not treat verbosity, repetition, spelling problems, fragmented recall, or emotional presentation as proof of dishonesty or as proof that an allegation is true.

Key documentary sources

Date/source	Documented point
Sept. 24, 2018 — Erica Crawford, PsyD	Physical, neurocognitive, and mental-health disabilities; PTSD; likely TBI-related deficits; detailed workplace accommodations.
Dec. 3, 2018 — psychologist to Irving Police	PTSD treatment and risk of symptom destabilization or fear of retaliation if family interviews occurred prematurely.
Apr. 20, 2020 — attorney Elisha Hollis	Difficulty walking and standing, debilitating PTSD flashbacks, unsuccessful job search, and need to pursue disability benefits.
Apr.–May 2020 therapy notes	Crutch use, pain, sleep problems, panic, financial stress, flashbacks, cognitive interference, and coping work.
July 23, 2025 — Life Connections	Crime-victim counseling since February 5, 2025; anxiety, depression, complex trauma; compliance and steady progress.
2026 disability/neuropsychological files	Ongoing disability application, testing, medical-record, and benefit material; original records should be reviewed for exact current restrictions.

 

Chapter 3 — Victim sheets and cold-case classifications

Bryanson created a repeatable victim-sheet format that separates victim description, pre-offense collection, offense conduct, and post-offense disposal or recovery information. He also built timelines, case-development logs, classification narratives, and location descriptions intended to help agencies search for unknown victim names and match allegations against existing records.

Work product	Located in current record
Completed victim sheets	15: three red-headed-girl sheets; sheets 1043 and 1047–1049; sheets 1506–1512; Weatherford worksheet.
Additional alleged victims in records request	4: Boy Scout, child possibly called Rachel, toddler, and young adult with an arm cast.
Flashback-series development log	6 entries concerning “The Joggers, the Necrophile, and the Friendly Man,” recording five alleged victims and no agency submission.
Timeline/classification material	Timeline for sheets 1506–1512; cold-case classification model in the civil-rights brief; reusable blank template.
Location control	Twin Falls addresses and drainage/alley areas; broad DFW-airport woods; historic Irving golf range near Highway 183; Weatherford Palo Pinto Drive; an unlocated wooded stream.
Maps	No standalone map/GIS file was found. Eight map exhibits are registered as pending; no coordinates were invented.

Victim-sheet control index

Series/ID	Count	Reported scene group	Status
Three Red Headed Girls 1–3	3	4105 Twin Falls / broad DFW-airport wooded area	Original sheets reproduced
1043, 1047, 1048, 1049	4	Reported abduction locations and backyard of 4105 Twin Falls	Original sheets reproduced
1506–1512	7	Irving golf driving range adjacent to Highway 183 and wooded area behind it	Original sheets reproduced
Weatherford woman	1	Exterior bathroom behind general store on Palo Pinto Drive	Workbook retained; summarized
Twin Falls records-search request	4 alleged victims	Drainage ditch, school area, and adjacent alley	Narrative request retained
Joggers flashback series	5 alleged victims	Wooded area near small stream outside unidentified town	Development log retained

Cold-case classification principles

·                     Use each sheet as a lead-generation tool, not as proof or a compelled match.

·                     Preserve original wording while creating a neutral investigative summary beside it.

·                     Separate direct recollection, flashback content, hearsay, family statement, inference, and independent record.

·                     Search historical police, medical-examiner, unidentified-decedent, missing-person, newspaper, school, property, aerial, weather, and directory records.

·                     Document negative findings and exclusions as carefully as potential matches.

·                     Protect precise private-property or possible-remains coordinates from public circulation.

The original victim-sheet exhibits begin immediately after the six substantive chapters so the narrative chapters remain readable. The exhibits are part of Chapter 3 by reference.

 

Chapter 4 — Mailings, receipts, and proof of contact

The outreach record shows sustained efforts to send cold-case packets and obtain review. It also demonstrates why the dossier must distinguish “researched,” “sent,” “delivered,” “acknowledged,” and “assigned.” A mailing or contact does not itself show that an agency opened an investigation.

Record	Documented content	Best evidentiary use
Cold Case excel Contacts for 4109 in 2020.xlsx	25 listed agencies/organizations. Many rows mark an open letter, victim sheet, personalized letter, envelope color, and stamped or certified mailing.	Reconstruct each packet and identify which rows have delivery or return-card proof.
COLD CASE MEDIA CONTACTS 2024 - Copy.xlsx	96 rows of law-enforcement, missing-person, academic, media, podcast, university, and cold-case contact research.	Contact research and outreach planning; not proof every recipient was contacted.
Texas Dept Intro Letter 2017	States that journal entries, victim sheets 1506–1512, and a timeline were being supplied to Texas Rangers.	Packet-content declaration.
ELISHA HOLLIS 2017.jpg	Attorney confirms representation, seriousness of Bryanson’s submission, and contact through counsel.	Third-party transmittal support.
FBI COVER PAGE 2017 / FBI book 2016	Prepared federal cover and cold-case packet with victim sheets.	Shows packet preparation; additional receipt proof should be paired with it.
Appeals Receipt / service confirmations / records correspondence	Administrative receipts and confirmation documents concerning benefits, counseling, and record requests.	Shows receipt or service in the specific administrative matter, not cold-case acceptance unless the document says so.

Submission ledger fields

Field	Required entry
Submission ID	Unique control number.
Recipient	Agency, office, unit, and named custodian if known.
Date/method	Email, web portal, certified mail, hand delivery, or other method.
Attachments	Exact filenames and page counts.
Proof	Tracking, return receipt, sent-email PDF, portal confirmation, or acknowledgment.
Agency number	Case, complaint, reference, records-request, or tracking number.
Status	Sent, delivered, acknowledged, assigned, referred, declined, closed, or unknown.
Disposition	Exact written response, date, official, and appeal/reconsideration route.

Administrative-exhaustion caution. A police department’s refusal to publicize or investigate a lead is not automatically “administrative exhaustion” or a civil-rights violation. The legally relevant record is the exact complaint or request filed, the available review path, each final response, and any affirmative interference, discrimination, retaliation, conflict, or records misconduct. Counsel should identify which exhaustion rules, if any, apply to a particular claim.

 

Chapter 5 — Email communications

The supplied email collection supports treatment continuity, records transmission, outreach, and the broader chronology. Email exhibits should be preserved in original electronic form when possible because a printed PDF may omit complete headers, attachments, metadata, or linked content.

Email/communication	Date or period	What it documents	Handling note
Gmail — Assurasource/Medical Records	Aug. 19, 2025	AssuraSource staff transmitted medical records and provided office contact information.	Preserve the original message and attachments.
Gmail — Life Connections Letter	July 23, 2025	Program director transmitted the counseling letter and referenced a forthcoming after-visit summary.	Pair with the signed/issued service-confirmation letter.
Email Assurasource created 2-9-2026	Clinical record set includes intake and treatment material beginning June 2024.	The filename says “Email,” but the readable PDF content is primarily clinical documentation.	Classify as medical record, not ordinary correspondence.
Texas Department of State Health Services Email Reply 2025	2025	Agency reply concerning vital-record work.	Scanned/limited text extraction; review the original pages visually.
Email to Catholic priests of Greenville TX 2026	2026	Advocacy/outreach communication to clergy.	Scanned/limited text extraction; allegations require cautious distribution.
Cold-case and agency letters	2016–2026	FBI, Texas Rangers, Irving Police, constable, council, coroner, and civil-rights outreach prepared or submitted across the record.	Letters are not proof of delivery unless paired with receipt or response.
Family/third-party text screenshots	Undated in visible screenshots	Personal relationship communications and concern about contact.	Contextual only; not treated as cold-case corroboration.

Email exhibit protocol

·                     Export the original email as EML or MSG when possible, with complete headers and attachments.

·                     Create a PDF viewing copy, but retain the native file and calculate a hash for important evidence.

·                     Record sender, recipient, CC/BCC, sent time and time zone, subject, attachment names, and thread context.

·                     Separate drafted or unsent messages from sent messages; separate automated portal confirmations from human acknowledgments.

·                     Redact unrelated medical, financial, and third-party personal data from public or media copies.

·                     Do not infer agreement, investigative acceptance, or authenticity merely because an email was sent or received.

 

Chapter 6 — Reported civil-rights violations and second-cousin interference

Bryanson reports that his second cousin works for the Irving Police Department and is associated with missing-person matters. According to statements Bryanson says were relayed by immediate family members, the cousin instructed relatives to tell Bryanson to stop submitting cold cases, stated that detectives laughed at the submissions, announced that he would refuse to investigate them, and said the case files were thrown away. These are reported statements and allegations; they have not been independently verified in the supplied record.

Why Bryanson considers this a civil-rights and integrity issue

Issue	Reported basis	What must be established
Familial conflict/recusal	The employee is Bryanson’s second cousin; Bryanson alleges historic financial ties between the cousin’s household and the accused family.	Position, assignment, authority, family relationship, financial facts, disclosure, access to submissions, and actual decisions.
Interference or retaliation	Relatives reportedly conveyed an instruction to stop submitting cases and a refusal to investigate.	Exact words, date, speaker, recipients, threat or coercion, intent, and connection to protected reporting or proceeding.
Records integrity	Reported statement that submissions were thrown away.	Intake logs, emails, attachments, case entries, access logs, deletion logs, retention rules, backups, and custodians.
Disability access	Bryanson reports documented CPTSD, dissociation, learning and mobility limitations; he alleges ridicule or non-accommodation.	Agency knowledge, requested modifications, comparator treatment, denial, reason, and whether disability caused unequal access.
Municipal responsibility	Bryanson alleges more than one detective participated or supervisors tolerated dismissal.	Policy, established custom, final-policymaker decision, ratification, training failure, causation, and underlying violation.
Failure to publicize cases	Bryanson says Chief Derick Miller refused to use media contacts to find historical witnesses.	Law enforcement generally has broad investigative discretion; a refusal to publicize alone is not ordinarily a civil-rights violation. Any claim needs an independent unlawful basis.

Evidence-preservation and independent-review requests

·                     Recuse the second cousin and anyone under his influence from intake, review, classification, deletion, closure, or referral of Bryanson’s submissions.

·                     Preserve every submission, attachment, email, internal message, call recording, intake entry, access log, deletion log, note, and disposition.

·                     Identify every employee who received, accessed, discussed, forwarded, classified, closed, rejected, altered, or deleted the material.

·                     Interview separately each family member who received or heard the alleged instruction to stop reporting and obtain exact remembered words.

·                     Provide a written, trauma-informed, disability-accessible channel for future submissions and a written disposition for each packet.

·                     Refer any credible evidence of obstruction, retaliation, bribery, records tampering, or discrimination to an agency without the alleged conflict.

 

Legal framework for counsel to evaluate

Authority/topic	Relevance and caution
42 U.S.C. § 1983	Requires deprivation of a federal right by a person acting under color of state law; disagreement with investigative strategy alone is insufficient.
Title II, Americans with Disabilities Act; 28 C.F.R. Part 35	Public entities must provide equal access, reasonable modifications, and effective communication; proof requires disability-related denial or unequal access.
Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978)	Municipal liability generally requires policy, custom, final-policymaker action, or deliberately inadequate training—not respondeat superior alone.
Texas Penal Code Chapters 36 and 37	Potential obstruction, retaliation, bribery, and governmental-record issues have specific elements and must be evaluated from evidence, not labels.
Administrative processes	Use Internal Affairs, city grievance/records processes, disability-access channels, and any applicable appeal path; obtain written final responses. Exhaustion requirements vary by claim and forum.

Legal-review notice. This chapter organizes allegations and preservation requests. It is not legal advice, does not declare that a civil-rights violation occurred, and should be reviewed by qualified counsel using original communications and agency records.

Primary Chapter 6 sources

Civil_Rights_Conflict_and_Interference_Brief.docx 2026.docx; FBI color of law complaint 2026.pdf; Bryanson PTSD letter signed; 2017 attorney/Texas Rangers correspondence; cold-case submission trackers; family-witness statements and communications if later supplied.

 

Consolidated exhibit and missing-evidence register

Group	Included source classes	Important missing or follow-up item
A — Personal history	FBI book, journals, narratives, therapist-prompted writing, advocacy summaries	Independent corroboration, contemporaneous records, source tagging for each allegation.
B — Disability	ADA letter, PTSD police letter, attorney disability letter, counseling confirmation, therapy/medical/neuropsychological files	Readable current homebound certification and exact current functional restrictions if available.
C — Victim sheets	15 completed sheets, blank template, 1506–1512 timeline, flashback log, records-search request	Official case matches, source-coded revisions, and any additional victim sheets not yet uploaded.
D — Maps	Location register only	Original maps, sketches, aerial annotations, GIS/KML/KMZ files, dates, legends, and confidence markings.
E — Mail/receipts	2020 contact tracker, 2024 contact research, transmittal letters, administrative receipts	Certified-mail receipts, return cards, portal confirmations, complete packet copies, final dispositions.
F — Emails	AssuraSource, Life Connections, DSHS, clergy, and other supplied correspondence	Native EML/MSG, full headers, attachments, and email threads for key cold-case and cousin communications.
G — Civil rights	Civil-rights brief and FBI color-of-law complaint	Signed family witness statements, exact cousin communications, agency intake/access/deletion records, IA and city final responses.

Selected academic and legal reading

·                     American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed., text revision — PTSD and dissociative symptoms; clinical diagnosis does not establish historical criminal facts.

·                     Judith L. Herman, Trauma and Recovery — trauma, memory, safety, remembrance, and reconnection.

·                     Bessel van der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score — trauma and bodily/cognitive effects; use alongside current clinical literature and professional evaluation.

·                     National Institute of Justice, cold-case investigation resources — evidence review, prioritization, and multidisciplinary case work.

·                     42 U.S.C. § 1983; Title II of the ADA; 28 C.F.R. Part 35; Monell v. Department of Social Services — core civil-rights and municipal-liability framework.

·                     Texas Public Information Act and applicable municipal retention schedules — counsel should assess access and preservation routes for agency records.

End of six substantive chapters. The following pages reproduce the original victim sheets and the 2017 attorney transmittal exhibit.

 

Appendix A — Original “Three Red Headed Girls” victim sheets

The next three pages reproduce the supplied combined victim-sheet document. These pages preserve the author’s original wording and formatting. Their inclusion documents the report; it does not verify the allegations.

 

EXHIBIT A-01  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED VICTIM SHEET

 

EXHIBIT A-02  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED VICTIM SHEET

 

EXHIBIT A-03  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED VICTIM SHEET

 

Appendix B — Original legacy numbered victim sheets

The following eleven pages reproduce every newly supplied numbered victim sheet. Graphic allegations remain in the original exhibits so the source record is not silently altered; the neutral index should be used for initial review.

 

EXHIBIT G-01A  |  VICTIM 1043  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-01B  |  VICTIM 1047  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-01C  |  VICTIM 1048  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-01D  |  VICTIM 1049  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-02  |  VICTIM 1506  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-03  |  VICTIM 1507  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-04  |  VICTIM 1508  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-05  |  VICTIM 1509  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-06  |  VICTIM 1510  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-07  |  VICTIM 1511  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

EXHIBIT G-08  |  VICTIM 1512  |  SUBJECT-AUTHORED

 

Appendix C — 2017 attorney transmittal support

This letter documents attorney representation and the request that Texas Rangers contact counsel when seeking to speak with Bryanson. It does not independently verify the underlying offenses.