WRITING THROUGH THE AMNESIC DIVIDE: JUST AI AND I TOGATHER TRYING TO 'SEND THE DEAD HOME' 2026
WRITING THROUGH THE AMNESIC DIVIDE
An Academic
Analysis of Brian “Happy” Bryanson’s Poetry, Journals, and Cold-Case Corpus
Complex
Post-Traumatic Stress • Dissociative Amnesia • Narrative Reconstruction • Moral
Witness
Corpus
analyzed: 58 distinct readable works • 195,580 words
Prepared as an AI-assisted academic interpretation of a lived-experience
archive
CPTSD COLD CASE
• “SEND THE DEAD HOME”
Abstract
This paper examines 58 distinct readable works totaling
approximately 195,580 words from Brian “Happy” Bryanson’s CPTSD Cold Case
archive. The corpus crosses conventional genres: poem, journal, dream report,
trauma narrative, professional memoir, correspondence, investigative appeal,
victim sheet, and philosophical reflection. It is therefore analyzed as a
hybrid literary-clinical archive rather than as a collection of verse alone.
The central argument is that Bryanson’s writing performs four simultaneous functions:
symptom record, autobiographical reconstruction, affect regulation, and moral
advocacy. Recurrent movement among bodily pain, intrusive imagery, dissociative
distance, writing, exhaustion, and renewed inquiry gives the corpus a looping
temporal structure. This structure is compatible with—but cannot by itself
diagnose—features discussed in research on PTSD, complex PTSD, dissociation,
and autobiographical memory.
The paper also addresses the relationship between the
archive and Bryanson’s cold-case claims. Trauma-informed practice requires that
fragmented or delayed reporting not be dismissed merely because it is
nonlinear. At the same time, literary vividness, repetition, bodily conviction,
or emotional intensity cannot substitute for corroboration. A five-level
evidence ladder is proposed to distinguish dream and metaphor, present
interpretation, repeated recollection, externally testable detail, and
independent corroboration. The legal discussion explains how disability-access
principles, effective communication requirements, victim-centered practice, and
Texas victims’ rights can inform agency response without creating a legal
conclusion that any particular reported crime occurred. This is an academic and
literary analysis, not a clinical diagnosis, forensic validation, or legal
opinion.
Reader and Evidence Notice
|
Material in
the archive |
What it can
establish |
What it cannot
establish by itself |
|
First-person
journal |
What
the author reported, felt, interpreted, or remembered when writing |
Independent
historical truth or criminal responsibility |
|
Dream
and symbolic scene |
Psychological
meaning, recurring imagery, and narrative organization |
Literal
occurrence of the depicted event |
|
Repeated
detail across versions |
Stability
within the author’s evolving account |
External
corroboration or accuracy |
|
Named
place, object, or person |
A
potentially testable lead |
Probable
cause, guilt, or admissibility |
|
Official
record or forensic result |
Independent
support within its documented scope |
Validation
of every surrounding inference |
1. Introduction: Poetry as an Archive of Survival
Bryanson’s corpus asks to be read at two levels at once. At
the literary level, it is a sustained poetics of survival: sadness becomes
weather, memory becomes architecture, amnesia becomes a box, an intensive-care
unit, a black hole, a broken helix, or a house whose rooms exchange places. At
the documentary level, the writing attempts to preserve names, locations,
vehicles, clothing, bodily sensations, conversations, and possible victim
details before they are lost again. The poems and journals do not merely
describe fragmentation; their form repeatedly enacts it through interruption,
capitalization, timestamped returns, abrupt changes of scene, second-person
address, humor after horror, and recursive revision.
The central academic problem is epistemological as well as
psychological: how should a reader honor testimony shaped by dissociation
without converting subjective certainty into unearned forensic certainty? The
answer proposed here is disciplined dual attention. The suffering, disability,
phenomenology, and moral intent of the writer deserve serious consideration.
Historical and criminal propositions require separate corroboration. This
position rejects both reflexive disbelief and reflexive confirmation.
The archive also records a life course. Earlier writings
emphasize employment, professional competence, workplace ostracism,
accommodations, and fear of losing a clinical identity. Later works
increasingly record disability, homebound authorship, bodily decline, family
deaths, isolation, and a widening cold-case mission. Across these phases, the
recurring title-like declarations—“Pain Finds Me Again and Again,” “Bricks of
Sadness Mortared with Shame,” “The Loneliness Is Huge,” “The Man in Black Is
Back,” and “Nails in a Forehead”—convert internal states into concrete scenes
that can be observed, named, and shared.
2. Corpus and Method
The working corpus contains 58 distinct readable works and
195,580 words after exact duplicate files were collapsed. Image-only PDFs were
subjected to optical character recognition. A Windows .lnk shortcut was
excluded because it pointed to, but did not contain, the underlying 2017
journal. The AI-framed derivative edition of “Nails in a Forehead” was excluded
from quantitative counts to prevent the academic commentary from inflating the
author’s original language. These decisions produce a conservative, reproducible
corpus.
The analysis combines close reading with descriptive text
counts. Term families were grouped into six interpretive domains. Counts
describe textual recurrence only; they are not symptom scores, prevalence
estimates, lie-detection measures, or proof of external events. Spelling
variation, OCR error, capitalization, and the author’s highly associative style
limit precision. The analysis therefore uses counts as orientation and close
reading as interpretation.
Figure 1. Term-family mentions across the deduplicated
corpus. “Body and regulation” includes pain, sleep, exhaustion, hunger, food,
body, and panic. “Memory and dissociation” includes flashback, memory,
dissociation, amnesia, and dream. Overlap among categories is intentional
because the writing links these domains. Source: author-provided corpus;
AI-assisted descriptive count.
Figure 2. The largest individual works carry a
disproportionate share of the corpus. Length itself becomes part of the
phenomenology: extended entries often record repeated return, interruption, and
consolidation. Source: author-provided corpus.
3. Clinical Framework: CPTSD, Dissociation, and Autobiographical Memory
3.1 CPTSD as more than fear memory
ICD-11 complex PTSD includes the core PTSD
domains—re-experiencing, avoidance, and a persistent sense of current
threat—plus disturbances in self-organization involving affect regulation,
negative self-concept, and relationship difficulties (Cloitre et al., 2020;
Maercker et al., 2021; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, n.d.). This
framework is useful for reading Bryanson because the corpus extends far beyond
discrete fear episodes. It repeatedly addresses shame, perceived defectiveness,
abandonment, longing for reliable attachment, intense sadness, anger, social
exclusion, and the effort to maintain a coherent moral identity.
A literary analysis must not convert thematic resemblance
into diagnosis. Bryanson reports professional diagnoses and disabilities, but
this paper does not independently assess him. Its narrower claim is that the
archive organizes experience around domains that CPTSD scholarship identifies
as central: threat, emotional regulation, self-concept, and relationship
disturbance.
3.2 Dissociative amnesia and the problem of access
Dissociative amnesia is generally discussed as difficulty
retrieving important autobiographical information that is not adequately
explained by ordinary forgetting or a known neurological condition. Reviews
describe considerable clinical heterogeneity and emphasize autobiographical
memory, particularly retrograde access (Staniloiu & Markowitsch, 2014; Taïb
et al., 2023). The corpus repeatedly portrays memory not as erased but as
inaccessible, quarantined, sleeping, hidden, or released in fragments. “The
ICU of my amnesic mind” is a particularly concentrated metaphor: memory is
imagined as alive yet unresponsive, attended by internal caregivers, and
awaiting possible return.
Scientific debate remains important. Research does not
support the simplistic proposition that traumatic memory is always uniquely
fragmented, nor does subjective amnesia automatically demonstrate absence of
memory traces. Studies vary according to how fragmentation, dissociation, and
coherence are measured (Bedard-Gilligan & Zoellner, 2012; Bedard-Gilligan
et al., 2017; Rubin et al., 2008, 2010). Some experimental work has found
objective transfer of information despite subjective reports of inter-identity
amnesia, although such findings do not resolve every clinical presentation
(Huntjens et al., 2012). A responsible analysis must therefore describe
Bryanson’s subjective experience without presenting any single memory theory as
settled fact.
3.3 Involuntary return and voluntary difficulty
A recurring paradox in trauma-memory literature is that a
person may struggle to retrieve an organized account voluntarily while
experiencing involuntary images, sensations, or emotional states. Berntsen and
Rubin (2014) discuss the coexistence of involuntary memories and reported
amnesia. Bryanson’s writing repeatedly stages this paradox: he cannot command a
full sequence, yet a smell, meal, body position, dream, image, or feeling can
precipitate an intensely vivid fragment. The document then becomes a retrieval
scaffold—an external surface on which fragments can be ordered, compared, and
revisited.
4. Literary Architecture of the Corpus
4.1 Concrete metaphors for invisible states
The titles are miniature theories. “Bricks of Sadness
Mortared with Shame” imagines emotional suffering as a structure built over
time. “Living Being Falling into a Black Hole” converts depressive or
dissociative descent into gravitational capture. “Double Helix of Infinity”
represents the interweaving of advocacy and persecution without resolution.
“The Nostalgic Displacement of the Now and Then: One House to Another” turns
autobiographical time into unstable architecture. “Trapped in a Coffin with a Zombie”
collapses helplessness, proximity to death, and immobilization into one
compressed horror image. These metaphors do not function merely as decoration;
they are cognitive instruments that make overwhelming, partially verbal
experience narratable.
4.2 Temporality: the past interrupts the present
Ordinary chronological autobiography moves from then to now.
Bryanson’s corpus often reverses that direction: the past arrives inside the
present and temporarily reorganizes it. A lunch, refrigerator failure, MRI
cage, tooth extraction, restaurant, laptop transfer, family death, or physical
ache becomes an aperture. The narrator timestamps the present, enters a
remembered or dreamlike scene, comments on his bodily state, and later returns
to revise the meaning. The result is not a straight timeline but a palimpsest
in which multiple times remain visible.
4.3 Voice, capitalization, repetition, and humor
The older writings frequently use all capitals, compressed
syntax, and breathless paragraphing. These formal properties intensify urgency
and may also reflect the technological and emotional conditions of composition.
Repetition—“BAM,” “wow,” “then,” “I remember,” “I don’t know,” “this is all I
have”—acts as rhythm, self-cue, and epistemic marker. Humor, including laughter
strings and deliberately absurd comparisons, often appears immediately beside
pain. Rather than trivializing suffering, humor provides distance, restores
agency, and signals the adult narrator’s continued presence.
4.4 The child, clinician, witness, and professor-self
At least four narrative positions recur. The child-self
experiences sensory threat and limited comprehension. The adult witness
attempts to reconstruct events. The clinical social worker interprets behavior
through trauma, attachment, dissociation, personality, and systems language.
The professor-self seeks to teach readers by turning lived experience into
theory. These voices can cooperate, but they can also shape one another. Adult
concepts may illuminate childhood experience while simultaneously influencing
how fragments are organized. The archive is strongest when it preserves both
levels rather than silently replacing the child’s language with the adult’s
conclusion.
5. Longitudinal Effects: How CPTSD and Dissociative Amnesia May Shape a
Life
The corpus suggests cumulative rather than isolated impact.
The relevant unit is not a single flashback but a long cycle involving
triggers, bodily activation, image or fragment, interpretation, writing,
exhaustion, and later return. Recovery is depicted as recursive: the same theme
may reappear with new details, different affect, or a revised causal
explanation.
Figure 3. Interpretive model derived from recurring
transitions in the corpus. It describes the writing’s structure and should not
be used as a diagnostic algorithm.
|
Domain over
time |
Manifestation
in the corpus |
Possible
functional consequence |
|
Memory
access |
Gaps,
fragments, dreams, delayed associations, repeated revision |
Difficulty
producing a concise linear account on demand |
|
Affect
regulation |
Profound
sadness, anger without an immediate object, shame, humor, sudden relief |
Periods
of flooding, numbing, or rapid state change |
|
Body
and sleep |
Pain,
panic, exhaustion, hypersomnia, hunger, gastrointestinal distress |
Reduced
stamina and delayed recovery after intense writing |
|
Identity |
Child
witness, disabled adult, clinician, foster father, advocate, archivist |
Both
continuity-building and conflict among roles |
|
Relationships |
Longing
for “kiddos,” fear of rejection, family estrangement, institutional mistrust |
Sensitivity
to exclusion and strong reliance on safe relationships |
|
Work
and disability |
Professional
competence followed by workplace fear and later homebound authorship |
Loss
of structure alongside creation of a new mission-centered identity |
|
Moral
meaning |
Compulsion
to document victims and “send the dead home” |
Purpose
and persistence, but also elevated stakes for each fragment |
6. Writing as Regulation, Research, and Risk
Narrative writing has been studied as a PTSD intervention,
with evidence suggesting potential benefit for some adults, although outcomes
vary and writing is not harmless or sufficient for everyone (Sloan et al.,
2015; Gerger et al., 2022; Scheer et al., 2023). Bryanson’s journals describe
immediate decreases in pressure or a sense of release, followed at times by
pain or prolonged sleep. The corpus therefore supports a distinction between
subjective short-term relief and broader clinical outcome. Relief is real as
experience; it does not automatically show symptom remission or memory
accuracy.
Writing also creates a version history. This is
scientifically useful when originals are preserved. Researchers can compare the
earliest account with later additions, distinguish stable from changing
details, and identify when clinical or investigative vocabulary entered the
narrative. Silent correction would destroy that evidence. Progressive paper
numbering, dated editions, watermarks, and preservation of original files are
consequently not merely branding choices; they are archival controls.
There is also risk. Repeated public posting can expose
identifiable people, intensify conflict, invite harassment, or transform
inference into apparent fact through repetition. Graphic writing may distress
the author or readers. A trauma-informed publication strategy should therefore
include content warnings, pauses, privacy review, clear evidentiary labels, and
clinician support when writing causes destabilization.
7. Relationship to the Cold Cases
7.1 From moral injury to investigative mission
“Send the Dead Home” is the corpus’s unifying ethical
imperative. The phrase converts helpless witnessing into service to unknown
others. Bryanson’s history as a social worker and foster father gives this
mission a recognizable professional grammar: protect the vulnerable, document
what others overlook, and return identity to those reduced to absence.
Cold-case work is therefore not an external hobby attached to the poetry; it is
the organizing moral response through which the archive seeks restoration.
7.2 The evidence problem
The archive contains details that may be externally
testable: locations, schools, employee populations, approximate periods,
clothing, vehicles, geographic relationships, and alleged institutional
contacts. It also contains dreams, transformed bodies, symbolic figures,
inferred motives, reconstructed dialogue, and adult interpretations of
childhood scenes. Those categories must never be collapsed. Investigators need
concise lead sheets; literary readers need the full phenomenology. One document
cannot optimally perform both functions.
Figure 4. Evidence ladder proposed for converting narrative
material into responsible investigative leads. Movement upward requires
additional support; repetition alone does not equal corroboration.
7.3 Recommended two-archive system
·
Literary-clinical archive:
preserve the complete poem or journal, timestamps, metaphors, bodily responses,
uncertainty, and later commentary.
·
Investigative lead archive:
extract one claim per sheet with source date, earliest wording, location, time
range, testable elements, uncertainty, prior submissions, and corroboration
status.
·
Version ledger: record
whether a detail is original, newly remembered, inferred, dream-derived,
corrected, contradicted, or externally supported.
·
Publication copy: remove
private contact data, use content warnings, and label allegations and memories
as such.
·
Agency packet: prioritize a
small number of independently checkable facts rather than sending the entire
literary corpus as an undifferentiated report.
8. Legal and Institutional Framework
This section identifies relevant principles and does not
offer legal advice or conclude that Bryanson qualifies as a statutory victim or
witness in any particular matter. Such status depends on facts, jurisdiction,
definitions, and agency or court determinations.
8.1 Disability access and effective communication
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to
state and local government services. Department of Justice regulations require
public entities to take appropriate steps so communications with people with
disabilities are as effective as communications with others and to furnish
appropriate auxiliary aids or services when necessary; the regulations also
require primary consideration to the individual’s requested aid or service,
subject to legal limits (28 C.F.R. § 35.160; U.S. Department of Justice, n.d.).
For a person who reports homebound status, cognitive disability, panic around
in-person law-enforcement settings, and a need for email communication,
possible accommodations may include written correspondence, scheduled remote
communication, clear questions, additional processing time, and avoidance of
unannounced visits. Whether a specific modification is required depends on
individualized assessment and applicable defenses; the ADA does not require an
agency to accept an allegation as true or to conduct a particular
investigation.
8.2 Trauma-informed victim and witness practice
DOJ materials describe victim-centered and trauma-informed
approaches as methods for recognizing trauma, responding to its effects, and
resisting retraumatization. Guidance on law-enforcement response notes that
trauma-informed interviewing can improve communication and investigation (U.S.
Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women, 2022; Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services, 2020). Applied to this corpus, the
principle is procedural: nonlinear recall, distress, or disability should shape
how questions are asked and documented. It does not mean that inconsistencies
are irrelevant or that corroboration is unnecessary.
8.3 Victims’ rights and their limits
The federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771,
provides enumerated rights to qualifying federal crime victims, including
fairness and respect for dignity and privacy. The Texas Constitution, article
I, section 30, and Texas Code of Criminal Procedure chapter 56A similarly
enumerate rights for qualifying victims within the criminal justice system,
including fairness and respect. These provisions are important to the moral and
procedural context of Bryanson’s requests. They do not automatically establish
victim status for every person described in a journal, compel prosecution,
create a right to a preferred investigative outcome, or substitute for
jurisdiction-specific legal advice.
|
Principle |
Responsible
application |
Overstatement
to avoid |
|
ADA
effective communication |
Consider
accessible written or remote channels and clear, structured questions |
“The
ADA requires police to believe or investigate every claim.” |
|
Trauma-informed
practice |
Reduce
retraumatization while obtaining specific, testable information |
“Fragmentation
proves trauma or accuracy.” |
|
Victims’
rights |
Treat
qualifying victims fairly and respectfully within the applicable system |
“A
journal alone automatically establishes statutory victim status.” |
|
Free
expression |
The
author may publish opinions subject to applicable law |
“Publication
eliminates defamation, privacy, or safety risk.” |
|
Evidence
preservation |
Retain
originals, metadata, dates, and version history |
“More
pages necessarily create stronger evidence.” |
9. Academic Interpretation of Major Recurring Motifs
|
Motif cluster |
Interpretive
function |
|
Houses,
rooms, boxes, coffins, and the ICU |
Containers
represent both protection and imprisonment. They organize memory spatially
when chronology fails. |
|
Water,
waves, rivers, black holes, and falling |
These
images represent loss of control, depth, engulfment, and movement between
conscious states. |
|
Food,
restaurants, hunger, and feeding |
Food
joins deprivation, care, belonging, bodily regulation, shame, and the
present-day “kiddo lunch.” |
|
Barns,
horses, vehicles, roads, and ravines |
Movement
and rural space become scene markers in the alleged cold-case material and
recurring stages for danger. |
|
Children,
Boy Scouts, students, and foster children |
The
vulnerable child functions as remembered self, possible victim, moral
responsibility, and hoped-for restoration. |
|
Police,
binders, DNA, emails, and lists |
Bureaucratic
objects represent the effort to translate subjective memory into
institutional evidence. |
|
Angels,
God, purgatory, and “Send the Dead Home” |
Religious
language provides moral cosmology, hoped-for reunion, judgment, and purpose. |
|
Laughter,
exaggeration, and absurdity |
Humor
interrupts horror, asserts present agency, and makes continued narration
possible. |
10. Limitations and Ethical Safeguards
·
This paper analyzes
writing; it does not conduct a clinical interview, neuropsychological
assessment, forensic examination, or criminal investigation.
·
Keyword counts are
sensitive to document length, spelling, OCR, repetition, and overlapping
categories.
·
The corpus was supplied by
the author and was not independently authenticated against contemporaneous
records.
·
Names and allegations can
affect living people. Publication should distinguish allegation from
adjudicated fact and obtain legal review when risk is substantial.
·
Memory can be sincere yet
incomplete, altered, source-confused, or incorrect. Emotional intensity and
sensory detail do not resolve accuracy.
·
The corpus includes
references to suicidal ideation and severe distress. Academic interpretation
should never replace current clinical care or crisis support.
·
The writer’s dignity and
agency require avoiding both sensationalism and diagnostic reductionism.
11. Recommendations for Professional Review
·
Create a multidisciplinary
review team: trauma clinician, autobiographical-memory researcher, literary
scholar, archivist, disability-access specialist, and a cold-case investigator
or forensic analyst.
·
Preserve original documents
and generate read-only hashes before editing or publication.
·
Build a master chronology
that separates date written, date remembered, estimated event date, date
submitted to an agency, and date externally confirmed.
·
Code every substantive
statement by source type: direct recollection, dream, metaphor, hearsay,
present inference, or documentary record.
·
Identify the earliest
version of each alleged event and compare later versions without treating
change as automatic deception or automatic recovery.
·
Extract a limited set of
high-value leads based on specificity and independent testability.
·
Use accessible,
email-first, scheduled communication when consistent with the author’s
documented needs and agency obligations.
·
Pair public storytelling
with privacy review, content warnings, and a non-graphic summary for general
readers.
·
Study the corpus
longitudinally as a case of self-archiving under disability, not solely as a
catalog of alleged crime.
12. Conclusion: Teaching the World How to Read Brian “Happy” Bryanson
Bryanson’s poetry and journals are not orderly depositions,
and they should not be forced into that shape. They are a record of a person
trying to build continuity while experiencing memory as discontinuous, bodily,
involuntary, and morally urgent. The archive’s literary importance lies in its
conversion of states that are difficult to communicate—amnesia, dissociation,
shame, pain, abandonment, hypervigilance, and sudden return—into durable
images. Bricks, waves, screens, houses, bottles, barns, boxes, black holes,
hospital rooms, and roads become an alternative cognitive map.
Over time, the corpus documents both loss and
transformation: loss of uncomplicated family belonging, professional community,
physical mobility, confidence in institutions, and ordinary chronology;
transformation of the disabled and homebound writer into an archivist,
advocate, professor-self, and “foster father of the missing.” The cold-case
mission gives forward direction to a life repeatedly pulled backward. “Send the
Dead Home” is therefore both a claim about unidentified victims and a statement
about the author’s own struggle to return disowned experience to the human
story.
The archive should neither be dismissed because it is
fragmented nor treated as self-validating because it is vivid. Trauma-informed
seriousness requires something harder: compassion joined to method. Preserve
the original language. Respect disability. Ask clear questions. Separate memory
from inference and metaphor. Compare versions. Seek records. Corroborate what
can be corroborated. Leave uncertainty visible. This approach protects
potential victims, the integrity of investigation, the rights of named people,
and Bryanson’s credibility as a narrator of his own experience.
The most defensible academic conclusion is that the
corpus constitutes a major lived-experience archive of CPTSD, dissociative
memory, disability, narrative identity, and moral witness. Its value does not
depend on proving every remembered scene. Its value begins with the fact that
it shows, across nearly two hundred thousand words, how one person has
attempted to survive fragmentation by writing himself into continuity—and how
he has tried to turn that continuity toward the service of people he believes
were lost.
References
Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101–12213.
Bedard-Gilligan, M., & Zoellner, L. A. (2012).
Dissociation and memory fragmentation in posttraumatic stress disorder:
An evaluation of the dissociative encoding hypothesis. Memory, 20(3), 277–299.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3310188/
Bedard-Gilligan,
M., et al. (2017). Is trauma memory special? Trauma narrative fragmentation in
PTSD. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 50, 25–34.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5423394/
Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2014). Involuntary
memories and dissociative amnesia: Assessing key assumptions. Clinical Psychological Science, 2(2), 174–186.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4189812/
Cloitre, M.
(2020). ICD-11 complex post-traumatic stress disorder: Simplifying diagnosis in
trauma populations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 216(3), 129–131.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/E53B8CD7CF9B725FE651720EE58E93A4
Crime Victims’
Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3771
Gerger, H., et
al. (2022). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of expressive writing
treatments compared with psychotherapy, other writing treatments, and waiting
list control for adult trauma survivors. Psychological Medicine, 52.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9772920/
Huntjens, R. J. C., et al. (2012).
Inter-identity autobiographical amnesia in patients with dissociative identity
disorder. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e40580.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3399886/
Maercker, A., et al. (2021). Development of
the new CPTSD diagnosis for ICD-11. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion
Dysregulation, 8, 7.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40479-021-00148-8
Rubin, D. C., Berntsen, D., & Bohni, M. K.
(2008). Memory-based model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Review, 115(4), 985–1011.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2597428/
Rubin, D. C., et al. (2010). The coherence
of memories for trauma: Evidence from posttraumatic stress disorder.
Consciousness and Cognition, 19(3), 857–862.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2928852/
Scheer, J. R.,
et al. (2023). Expressive writing treatments to reduce PTSD symptom severity: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research Communications.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10475481/
Sloan, D. M., et al. (2015). Efficacy of
narrative writing as an intervention for PTSD: Does the evidence support its
use? Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 45, 215–225.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4669193/
Staniloiu, A., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2014). Dissociative
amnesia. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(3), 226–241.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26360734/
Taïb, S., et
al. (2023). What are the neural correlates of dissociative amnesia? A
systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9909275/
Texas
Constitution art. I, § 30.
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/cn/pdf/cn.1.pdf
Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure ch. 56A.
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.56A.htm
U.S. Department
of Justice. (n.d.). ADA requirements: Effective communication.
https://www.ada.gov/resources/effective-communication/
U.S. Department
of Justice. (2024). Title II regulations, 28 C.F.R. § 35.160.
https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/regulations/title-ii-2010-regulations/
U.S. Department
of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. (2020). Law
enforcement best practices: Lessons learned from the field.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1114671/dl?inline=
U.S. Department
of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. (2022). Improving law enforcement
response to sexual assault and domestic violence by identifying and preventing
gender bias. https://www.justice.gov/ovw/page/file/1509456/dl?inline=
U.S. Department
of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD. (n.d.). Complex PTSD: History
and definitions.
https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/essentials/complex_ptsd.asp
Appendix A. Deduplicated Corpus Inventory
The following inventory lists the distinct readable files
used for quantitative analysis. Word counts are approximate because OCR,
tables, and file conversion can alter tokenization. Titles are preserved as
supplied.
|
Work |
Approx. words |
|
1.
A BREAKTHROUGH IN GLENDA FLASHBACKS(1) |
643 |
|
2.
A JOB WELL DONE(1) |
692 |
|
3.
A LOT OF LIL THINGS(1) |
2,065 |
|
4.
AFTERMATH OF THE LAST SET OF FLASHBACKS(1) |
2,560 |
|
5.
AN ELEVATOR RIDE(1) |
526 |
|
6.
ANOTHER BARN ANOTHER PLACE ANOTHER KNOWN FACE 2026 |
8,184 |
|
7.
AS IF PTSD IS NOT ENOUGH TO DEAL WITH(1) |
1,161 |
|
8.
AnBah@cityofirving.org |
113 |
|
9.
BRICKS OF SADNESS MORTARED WITH SHAME 2026 |
4,312 |
|
10.
DISABILITY HAS BEGUN TO PAY(1) |
540 |
|
11.
DOUBLE HELIX OF INFINITY(1) |
588 |
|
12.
December 2nd 2025 @ 11_52 pm - brianhappybryanson@gmail.com - Gmail.html |
4,854 |
|
13.
Epiphany due to broken fridge 2025 |
237 |
|
14.
Final Draft (Happy) |
2,386 |
|
15.
GAME OF GAMES(1) |
863 |
|
16.
GIRL ABDUCTED SHOOTING HORSE 2026 |
7,042 |
|
17.
GLENDA AND HER PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE(1) |
1,848 |
|
18.
Gmail Cold Cases sent to many addresses asking for help 2025 |
7,744 |
|
19.
HEY MIKEY AND REESE SHELTON 2025 |
2,793 |
|
20.
HOW MANY PERVERTS KNEW MY NAME(1) |
1,835 |
|
21.
Hey Montana and Mica Reynolds 2025 |
823 |
|
22.
I GOT PURGATORY FOR THEIR SIN(1) |
594 |
|
23.
I KNEW A FLASHBACK WAS ON ITS WAY NOW ITS HERE 2025 |
2,372 |
|
24.
I MUST ENDURE THE FALSITIES(1) |
469 |
|
25.
I RAISED SE TURTLE AND OCTIPI 2026 |
10,861 |
|
26.
LAST NIGHTS FLASHBACK ANGERED ME |
1,584 |
|
27.
LATE INTO THE NIGHT OR EARLY IN THE MORN MY SADNESS AWAKENS MY FORLORN 2026 |
2,860 |
|
28.
LIVE THE LIE OR DIE(1) |
364 |
|
29.
LIVEING BEING FALLING INTO A BLACK HOLE |
2,081 |
|
30.
LIZA MINNELLI MADE ME FORGET MYSELF |
3,851 |
|
31.
ME AND MY KARMA WONDER |
574 |
|
32.
MORE FLASHBACKS MORE VICTIMS |
4,162 |
|
33.
PAIN FINDS ME AGAIN AND AGAIN(1) |
366 |
|
34.
PAST FLASHBACKS KEEP PUSHING THROUGH |
2,543 |
|
35.
NAILS IN A FOREHEAD |
15,999 |
|
36.
REMINDED ABOUT MY ABUSE DEFICITS |
2,641 |
|
37.
STELLA JEAN HAS ENTERED HOSPICE |
3,960 |
|
38.
STRANGE WAY TO FIND JUSTICE(1) |
543 |
|
39.
Scout Master who Betrayed a Boy Scout 2026 |
21,311 |
|
40.
THANKSGIVING 2023 |
3,186 |
|
41.
THE DEPTH OF PROFOUND SADNESS HAS SURFACED AGAIN 2026 |
17,633 |
|
42.
THE FIRST ENTRY OF 2024 |
4,382 |
|
43.
THE LAST LIAR HAS DIED |
3,361 |
|
44.
THE LONLINESS IS HUGE |
1,347 |
|
45.
THE MAN IN BLACK IS BACK 2026 |
14,139 |
|
46.
THE NOSTALGIC DISPLACEMENT OF THE NOW AND THEN ONE HOUSE TO ANOTHER 2026 |
6,493 |
|
47.
THE SPURIOUS ILLOGICAL, MOTIVES OF MAYHEM |
959 |
|
48.
THEY ALL THREE KNOW I HAVE PTSD |
558 |
|
49.
THIS AND THAT AND THEN SOME |
1,433 |
|
50.
THIS IS REALLY A PRESSURE COOKER OF UNFAIRNESS |
678 |
|
51.
TOO MANY VICTIMS FROM ONE FAMILY |
3,052 |
|
52.
TRAPPED IN A COFFIN WITH A ZOMBIE |
1,005 |
|
53.
WHAT A THEME GOD GAVE ME TO LIVE |
624 |
|
54.
WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ALL THIS |
511 |
|
55.
WHY DOES SOMETHING THAT I LOVE SO MUCH |
596 |
|
56.
YESTERDAY MY MORTALITY CAME TO VISIT 2026 |
5,356 |
|
57.
anji texts |
978 |
|
58.
elisha texts |
345 |
Appendix B. Proposed Coding Fields for Future Research
|
Field |
Allowed values
or description |
|
Document
identity |
Stable
ID, original filename, hash, date created, date modified |
|
Narrative
mode |
Poem;
journal; dream; correspondence; advocacy; victim sheet; retrospective
analysis |
|
Source
status |
Direct
recollection; dream; metaphor; hearsay; inference; external record |
|
Time |
Date
written; estimated event date; date first recalled; date revised |
|
Affect/body |
Emotion,
pain, sleep, hunger, panic, dissociation, perceived release |
|
Cold-case
data |
Person,
place, object, vehicle, institution, route, weather, clothing |
|
Certainty
language |
Certain;
probable; possible; unknown; contradicted |
|
Corroboration |
None;
internally repeated; external lead; record located; independently confirmed |
|
Publication
risk |
Private
data; living person; allegation; graphic content; minor; medical information |

Comments
Post a Comment