FOR 26 YEARS MEN HAVE LED THE WAY AND ALL THE DEAD ARE STILL WHERE THEY STAY: LETS MAKE A TEAM THATS READY TO GO AN ALL FEMALE STAFF WILL GET THIS DONE 2026

 

FORMAL CITIZEN REQUEST AND RESOLUTION

IT’S ABOUT TIME TO SEND THE DEAD HOME

Request for a Women-Led Texas Ranger Cold-Case Blind-Corroboration Pilot

★  ★  ★  ★  ★

TO	Major Wende O. Wakeman; Lt. Laura Simmons; Rangers Veronica Gideon, Sharee Irwin, and Nicole Martin (UCIP)
FROM	Brian “Happy” Bryanson, Citizen Investigative Journalist and Archive Publisher
DATE	August 4, 2026
RE	Formal request for one controlled review team and five bounded record comparisons
PAPER NO.	Progressive Research Paper 2026-08-04-02
STATUS	Unofficial citizen request; not a legal order, DPS directive, or finding of fact

“The correct response is controlled comparison—not automatic belief and not automatic dismissal.”
— AUTHOR ARCHIVE — Consistency Without Conflation, 2026

The Formal Request

I respectfully request that the five publicly identified women Texas Rangers named above be invited—through lawful DPS supervision and ordinary jurisdictional authority—to form a small pilot review group for five victim leads contained in my archive. The proposed working title is “It’s About Time to Send the Dead Home.”

The team would not be asked to accept my recollections as proven history. It would select one lead at a time, preserve the original account, compare distinctive details with independently held records, and return a written disposition: match, conflict, no record located, referral, jurisdictional barrier, or investigative escalation.

REQUESTED INITIAL ACTION: Assign Ranger Nicole Martin or another UCIP-designated reviewer as intake coordinator; issue a correspondence or intake reference number; select one lead for a 60-day records-comparison pilot; and identify the agency or prosecutor owning any next decision.

 

Why a Women-Led Pilot Is Worth Testing

A women-led group is proposed as a limited organizational experiment, not because women are inherently more truthful, compassionate, or capable than men (THOUGH IN MY EXPERIENCE THEY HAVE BEEN MY ENTIRE LIFE). Every participant must apply the same evidentiary rules. The potential advantage is structural: a new team, a defined owner, a different professional perspective, and a survivor-centered intake design may interrupt decades of institutional drift while preserving rigor and due process.

Organizational strength	Why it supports this pilot
BLUE — Independent records	School, weather, agency, property, medical-examiner, and archival records.
GREEN — Survivor-centered practice	Predictable communication, dignity, informed participation, and trauma-aware interviewing.
PURPLE — Interdisciplinary review	Cold-case investigation, crime analysis, memory science, victim advocacy, and legal oversight.
GOLD — Institutional continuity	A defined owner, written reference number, deadlines, and documented disposition.
RED — Evidentiary safeguards	No automatic belief, no public accusation, contradiction logging, and contamination controls.
TEAL — Diverse perspective	A women-led pilot may add perspective and trust while remaining subject to identical professional standards.

CENTRAL PRINCIPLE: Gender diversity may broaden perspective and improve engagement, but it does not replace jurisdiction, training, corroboration, evidence, or prosecutorial review.

What has not worked

·         No single accountable owner: Materials have moved among agencies and recipients without a documented lead-by-lead disposition.

·         Large packets without bounded asks: The volume of the archive can obscure the small number of details that are easiest to test.

·         Credibility decided before comparison: A conclusion about the witness can substitute for checking an address, roster, weather date, recovery record, or archived report.

·         Unclear chain of information: Repeated distribution can make it difficult to determine when a detail was first recorded and whether later public information affected it.

·         No written closure standard: The archive lacks a complete table showing which lead was searched, by whom, in which record systems, and with what result.

“Compare the details. Follow the records. Send the dead home.”
— AUTHOR ARCHIVE — One Detail Could Bring Someone Home, 2026

 

Twenty-Six Years Without a Documented Resolution

Beginning around 2000, I submitted reports and case-related materials to male-led law-enforcement offices. The surviving structured victim-sheet collection is most clearly documented from approximately 2020 forward. I cannot establish from the present archive that every current sheet was delivered in 2000, and this resolution does not make that claim.

What I can state is that the underlying information has been presented repeatedly for roughly 26 years, yet I do not possess a written, lead-by-lead record demonstrating that the five priority victim leads were each compared with the most relevant independent record systems. From my perspective, we are no closer to identifying these possible victims or “sending the dead home” than when the outreach began.

Period	Documented development	Accountability question
2000 onward	Repeated law-enforcement outreach and preservation of reported recollections.	Which agency retained each submission, and what searches were performed?
2017	DPS-related correspondence and earlier victim-information work survive.	Was a report or reference number assigned and preserved?
2020	Structured victim sheets and contact records are preserved.	Which sheet was compared with which independent record system?
2024–2025	Expanded requests, lead sheets, and intake confirmations.	Which office became the responsible owner?
2026	Blind-corroboration and solvability matrices created.	Will one bounded pilot now produce written results?

Priority order for the first five comparisons

Rank	Lead	Most testable anchors
1	Victim 123A — possible MacArthur cheerleader/athlete	Sleet-day school calendar, distinctive red jacket, age/appearance, school records, and fixed address.
2	Victim 123E — Lee Britain intern teacher	University placement, school semester, rear parking location, vehicle, and reported police-presence cue.
3	Victim 123C — Lee Britain employee	Personnel roster, age range, residential records, disappearance or unusual separation, and DFW route.
4	Victim 123B — Boy Scout	Uniform, approximate age, residential visit, escape route, creek location, and recovery/drowning records.
5	Victim 123G — toddler	Age, drainage location, injury, reported witness pursuit, and emergency-response records.

 

Citizen Resolution of Purpose

I therefore declare the following as the purpose and requested operating standard of this citizen proposal. These provisions are requests for voluntary agency consideration; they are not commands, subpoenas, appropriations, appointments, or legal findings.

RESOLVED 1 — ONE TEAM	A designated five-person women-led pilot, or another comparably diverse team selected by DPS, should receive one packet and one defined intake owner.
RESOLVED 2 — ONE LEAD AT A TIME	The team should begin with Victim 123A and complete a blind, staged comparison before opening the next card.
RESOLVED 3 — WRITTEN DISPOSITION	Every search should identify the custodian, years searched, query terms, result, limitation, and responsible reviewer.
RESOLVED 4 — BOTH DIRECTIONS	The team should preserve corroborating and disconfirming information and should never silently harmonize discrepancies.
RESOLVED 5 — PROTECTED IDENTITIES	No tentative candidate name should be published or taken to a family until the agency with jurisdiction determines that contact is justified.
RESOLVED 6 — TRAUMA-INFORMED COMMUNICATION	Communication with me should be predictable, in writing, and free from suggestive case information before any clean interview.
RESOLVED 7 — ACCOUNTABLE RESPONSE	Within 30 days, please acknowledge receipt and identify an owner; within 60 days, please report the pilot lead’s status or explain the barrier.

“Send the Dead Home.”
— BRIAN “HAPPY” BRYANSON — Mission statement

REQUESTED RESPONSE

Please acknowledge receipt, provide a correspondence or intake reference number, state whether one bounded comparison will be accepted, and identify the person responsible for the written disposition.

Respectfully submitted,

Brian “Happy” Bryanson

Citizen Investigative Journalist and Archive Publisher

https://cptsdcoldcase.blogspot.com/?zx=d5cf6aee654b8bfe
Founder, CPTSD Cold Case — “Send the Dead Home”
Email: CPTSDcoldcase@gmail.com
EMAIL COMMUNICATION ONLY

 

CLASSIFICATION: Unofficial citizen request and resolution. Not a Texas DPS publication, official badge, task-force charter, legal decree, judicial finding, probable-cause affidavit, or determination that any allegation is true.