Twin Falls and DFW Area Cold Case Lead Packet

Impact grid • witness recollections • geographic leads • three linked timelines

Prepared by Brian “Happy” Bryanson, LCSW | September 24, 2026 | CPTSDcoldcase@gmail.com | Email correspondence only

For Dallas cold case intake and Forensic Times editorial inquiry. This is a request for independent comparison of possible leads, not a finding that any person is missing, deceased, or responsible for a crime. The subject accounts arise primarily from later-emerging childhood recollection. A map symbol represents a reported search area, not a confirmed grave.

September 2026 My 57th birthday and Cold Case Month

I turned 57 this year. September is National Cold Case Month, a call to give unsolved cases renewed attention. The initiative was publicly launched as an inaugural observance in September 2024. This month brings my own long reporting history into focus: I began recalling childhood abuse in 1997, first recalled a possible murder in December 1999, and have sought an independent comparison of these accounts with records ever since. This could be the month we help “send the dead home” if investigators and others can identify testable leads and families through lawful, careful work. [S13]

Year	Personal and public timeline	Meaning for this submission
1969	My birth year, calculated from turning 57 in 2026.	Starting point of the childhood chronology; exact birthday is not stated here.
1997	My first abuse-related flashbacks began.	Beginning of the later-emerging recollection record.
December 1999	I date my first murder-related flashback to this month.	Beginning of my homicide-related reporting chronology.
September 2024	Inaugural National Cold Case Month was reported in the forensic community.	Public awareness observance, not an official finding about my leads.
September 2026	I am 57 and submitting this expanded lead packet during Cold Case Month.	Request for written intake, comparisons and referrals.

I report having DNA data with 23andMe, MyHeritage and a Family Tree genealogy service. I can identify the precise third service, account details and consent settings privately for a qualified investigator. These consumer accounts are potential family-reference resources, not proof of victim identity or of any link to a crime. Any comparison or transfer would require the appropriate consent, platform rules and investigative process. [S14]

POP The cul de sac lead

The strongest geographic question in my account is an unidentified DFW Airport area ravine reached from a gravel road and cul-de-sac. I remember low aircraft, a chain-link fence, deep thicket, a large tree and a steep ravine. I associate that area with disposal trips after events at 4105 Twin Falls Street, including the three red-haired sisters. I cannot give a surveyed position or verify remains there. I ask investigators to compare period aerial photography, road alignments, airport property records and known death investigations before considering any field work. [S1, S3]

I seek one written intake number, an independent comparison of the leads below with archived missing-person and medical-examiner records, and a short written disposition for each lead: match, contradiction, no record located, insufficient information, or referral. Forensic Times may use this as a basis for questions, but should seek agency and family confirmation before publishing identities or allegations.

Quick Impact grid

The rows represent leads in my materials. Counts are editorial groupings of reported people and must not be described as confirmed deaths or distinct official cases. The two Scout-related entries are separate recollections with a possible overlap to test. Louisiana work-related allegations lack a defensible person count.

ID	Reported person	Reported scene	First independent test
TF 01	Boy in Scout clothing; approximate teen	Twin Falls drainage	Reported recovery scene; compare police, EMS, ME and Scout records
TF 02	Young girl, possibly “Rachel,” roughly age 4	Opposite drainage side	Name uncertain; compare child, EMS and ME records
TF 03	Latino toddler boy, roughly age 2	Drainage cluster	Compare unidentified child records without restricting ethnicity labels
TF 04	Young man with left arm cast	Twin Falls alley	Compare left-arm injury and alley incident records
TF 05	Blond girl, roughly age 5	Neighboring street / 4105 property lead	Check historic occupancy, incident records and property changes
S1	Red-haired sister, about 8–10; ponytail/braids	4105 garage → reported DFW area	Compare three separate reports and travel/visitor records
S2	Red-haired sister, about 5–6; braids	4105 garage → reported DFW area	Same comparison; do not presume relationship or nationality
S3	Red-haired sister, about 12–15; blue dress	4105 garage → reported DFW area	Same comparison; test visitor-family hypothesis
LB 01	Teacher or employee, about 40–50	Lee Britain / reported home event	District personnel and missing-person comparison
LB 02	Student teacher in her 20s, short brown hair	Lee Britain parking lot	University placement, police and district comparison
LB 03	School professional, possible psychologist, long blue dress	Lee Britain / Irving ISD	Specialty staff and licensing comparison
IR 01	MacArthur cheerleader / athlete, blond, red varsity jacket	Twin Falls area; sleet-day account	School, activity, weather and missing-person comparison
IR 02	Teacher associated with Sam Houston Junior High	Bird streets / school; possible daughter also involved	Staff and student records; incident and missing-person check
IR 03	Mexican domestic worker associated with house across street	Twin Falls opposite residence	Household employment, witness and missing-person comparison
IR 04	Girl with special needs who rode a bicycle	Twin Falls sidewalk and side-door account	Neighborhood, school and missing-child check
IR 05	Cub Scout, about 8–10, brown hair and blue cap	Drainage ditch; reported slabs	Separate from TF 01 pending age, hair and recovery comparison
IR 06	Young woman linked to Bonanza or similar steak house	Irving restaurant / after shift	Historic employer, shift, police and missing-person records
IR 07	High-school girl said to attend Nimitz	Reported Alford garage	School enrollment and missing-person comparison; alleged death unverified
LA 01	Child near tennis court, looking for a dog	105 Beacon Hill Road, Pineville	Police search, dispatch, missing-child and neighbor records
LA cluster	Other work-related Louisiana allegations involving Glenda	Employer and town unspecified	Separate incident inventory needed before person count or location plot

Graph: 19 row-level person leads in this packet, including eight additions. This is a count of working entries, not confirmed distinct victims; Scout and school-related accounts may overlap. The unspecified Louisiana work cluster is excluded. [S1–S10]

Additional Accounts and verification

Twin Falls drainage and street

I report a Scout-clothed boy, a small child possibly called Rachel, a toddler and other people in or near the drainage and street area. My earlier packet lists five priority Twin Falls leads, including a young man with an arm cast in an alley and a neighboring blond child. The descriptions, recoveries and links to a single offender have not been independently confirmed. The fastest test is a date-bounded search of police response, medical-examiner, EMS and newspaper indexes, followed by comparison of distinctive clothing, age, injury and location details. A remembered collection by officers must not be treated as an official recovery record until a record is found. [S2]

The three sisters

I remember meeting three red-haired girls near a cul-de-sac by Twin Falls. They spoke with accents I interpreted as Irish. My victim sheets separately describe an older girl in a light blue dress, a middle child with a red ponytail and braids, and a younger child with red braids. The sheets report successive arrivals at the 4105 Twin Falls garage and different alleged assaults. My more recent message to Forensic Times adds that a red-haired man with a similar accent came to the door asking for his daughters. The relationship, national origin, travel mode and identities remain unverified; the hypothesis that they flew through DFW with passports is an inference. The sheets report transport in a brown truck to wooded DFW surroundings. Preserve the original sheets and ask whether missing-child, visitor, consular or other records supply an independent match. [S1, S3, S4]

Three Lee Britain Elementary employees

I associate three adult women with the period when my mother Glenda Shelton worked at Lee Britain Elementary, estimated around 1976. First is a teacher or school employee, approximately 40–50, whom I associate with an event at her home. Second is a student teacher in her twenties with short brown hair, whom I associate with an empty school parking lot. Third is a school professional whom I have described as a psychologist-type worker wearing a long blue dress. None has an independently established identity, disappearance, death or employment interruption in the materials reviewed for this packet. [S2]

The school offers a testable administrative trail: yearly staff directories, payroll and absence records, board minutes, yearbooks, substitute lists, university practicum placements, student-teacher evaluations and specialty staff rosters. Any apparent departure needs ordinary explanations checked first, including transfer, resignation, name change, illness and retirement. A candidate name should then be compared with missing-person, death, relocation, newspaper and incident records. In particular, confirm whether the third worker was a school psychologist before using that title in a public account. [S2]

Additional Irving leads

The MacArthur cheerleader or athlete account describes a blond teenager in a red varsity jacket arriving during sleet. I later associated her with a sale and another location; school and weather records could first narrow the date. A separate account describes a woman connected to Sam Houston Junior High who challenged my treatment at school; I remember a later event at a house in the Bird streets and possibly her daughter. Neither woman is identified in the records reviewed here. [S3, S7]

The Twin Falls map describes a young girl with special needs who rode a bicycle to the house and a woman doing domestic work through a residence across the street. The latter account speaks of multiple workers, but I list one representative lead pending an incident-by-incident inventory, rather than counting an unknown group as established missing persons. The bicycle rider must be compared against TF 05 before the entries can be counted as distinct. [S3]

A newly prepared Cub Scout sheet, dated September 7, 2026, reports a boy about eight to ten with short brown hair and a blue cap who knocked on the door and whom I associate with concrete slabs in the drainage ditch. This may differ from the older, blond teen Scout and recovery account in TF 01. The first independent step is to compare age, uniform, cap, date, ditch side, scene response and any drainage construction or maintenance record, without assuming either a second boy or one shared event. [S8]

My older victim-sheet material describes a young woman who took the family’s order at a Bonanza or similar restaurant; an outreach letter also referred to a girl missing after a Bonanza shift. The workplace and disappearance are not verified. My memoir separately alleges that Sgt. Alford held teenage girls in a garage and that some said they attended Nimitz High School. I have singled out the high-school girl you identified as a lead, but the available excerpt does not independently identify her or establish a death. These accounts call for employer, school and police records rather than an asserted match. [S9, S10]

Pineville child and other Louisiana work leads

A separate Pineville disclosure describes two girls coming from a tennis court near 105 Beacon Hill Road while looking for a dog. I recall my father seizing one, the other returning with an adult, and officers coming to the residence. The child’s name, outcome and agency are unknown. This belongs in a Louisiana referral and should not be merged with the Twin Falls Scout account. For the additional work-related disappearances I attribute to Glenda in Louisiana, I need an incident inventory with employer, town, approximate dates, employee descriptions and what I directly recall before each can be a person row or map point. [S11]

Reported geographic spread

Schematic location-lead map. It relates the Twin Falls house and drainage, Irving schools and workplaces, an unidentified DFW-area ravine, and a separate Pineville/Louisiana branch. Arrows reflect alleged relationships, not measured routes or confirmed disposal. Sam Houston, Bonanza, Nimitz and Louisiana workplaces have no verified point plotted. The original maps contain further locations, including the Highway 183 golf-range creek and Weatherford area, but no combined body count is defensible. A qualified investigator can georeference source maps against period aerials. [S2, S3, S5, S11]

Three timelines What is reported and what can be checked

Period	Alford and my father	My disclosure and memory	Jeremy Hummert and records access
1970s–early 1980s	I allege Sgt. Jim Alford, described in my accounts as an Irving missing-person detective, had a paid relationship with Robert Shelton. I recall him bringing files to our home and allege that files were sold, withheld or destroyed. Position, transactions and file disposition require official records.	I was a child at the reported scenes; my later recall cannot itself establish a contemporaneous case.	No role alleged for Jeremy in this period.
1997–2000	Historical claims begin to be documented in my later reports.	Abuse flashbacks began about 1997; I date my first murder-related memory to December 1999 and began sustained reporting around 2000.	No specific event asserted.
2000–2024	Seek Alford personnel, assignment, disciplinary and missing-person file audit records where retained.	Repeated agency contacts, victim sheets and location narratives accumulated. Preserve dated originals and submission receipts.	His exact appointment dates, duties and access are to be verified.
2025–2026	The alleged historical conflict remains untested by documents available to me.	I continued submissions and organized renewed case and map packets.	I report that a message came through family, around September 2025, instructing me to stop sending files and saying staff laughed at the submissions. I identify Jeremy Hummert as my second cousin twice removed and believe he now has a comparable missing-person role. Verify identity, job title, supervisory chain, intake logs and the exact statement with direct records or witnesses.

These timelines coexist because the alleged events, the later recovery and reporting of memory, and the present handling of submissions are different evidence streams. A later recollection can guide a records search; a documented intake or refusal can establish what an agency did with a submission; neither establishes the historical crime by itself.

Alford allegation and present conflict request

My account is that Robert Shelton used Sgt. Jim Alford as a close associate. I allege that Alford, while working missing-person investigations, brought case files to our home, accepted payment, and enabled my father to know what police had received or to prevent reports from advancing. The three-sister sheets also attribute a brown truck to Alford and report his involvement in removal. These are serious allegations, not established findings. Investigators should test Alford’s employment and assignment dates, address and vehicle ownership, contemporaneous complaint and evidence logs, file retention or destruction schedules, and any extant case audit trail before drawing a conclusion. [S3, S4]

I also report that Jeremy Hummert is a relative and holds a role comparable to the missing-person position I attribute to Alford. I received a discouraging message through family rather than a written agency decision. Why resistance has seemed unbreakable to me remains unknown. Possibilities to distinguish include an unverified account of what Jeremy said, an intake routing problem, an agency view that no matching records were found, records loss, jurisdictional limits, workload, or an actual conflict affecting handling. None should be presented as his motive without evidence. Please route my packet outside any potentially involved individual’s chain for a documented, conflict-aware intake review, preserve communications and provide a written disposition. [S6]

Specific requests

· Dallas cold case intake: acknowledge receipt, assign one reference number and compare each grid row with surviving missing-person, death-investigation, school and property records.

· Records and integrity review: verify Alford’s assignment and file access, Jeremy’s current title and access, the family-relayed statement, and whether prior submissions were logged or referred. Use a reviewer without a familial conflict if one is substantiated.

· Geospatial review: reconstruct the historic cul-de-sac, gravel road, fence, thicket, drainage and airport boundaries. Record each possible match, contradiction and uncertainty; do not excavate on this packet alone.

· Forensic Times: direct any identity or crime claims to independent documents and agency comment; avoid publishing addresses or purported burial points as verified facts.

· Please reply by email only. Do not call or arrange unexpected appointments.

Source and exhibit control

S1. Forensic Times Reply 2026docx.docx, user-provided record of LinkedIn exchange; message offers victim sheets and contains later recollections and hypotheses.

S2. Twin Falls Cold Case Lead Packet, July 29, 2026, eight individual lead summaries; Lee Britain staff descriptions and verification work.

S3. Twin Falls Abduction and Discarded Map 2026 and Ravine Dump Site 2026, witness-created narrative map exhibits; no surveyed coordinates.

S4. Three Red Headed Girls Combined Victim Sheets 2020, three separate accounts.

S5. Irving Body Map 2026, witness-created Highway 183/golf-range location aid.

S6. User account of Jeremy Hummert and a family-relayed message; no independent personnel or verbatim communication record reviewed for this packet.

S7. Letter to Dr Rachel Toles 2026, cheerleader lead and priority school grouping.

S8. Cub Scout Newly Recalled Victim Sheet, September 7, 2026; distinct working account under concrete slabs.

S9. Cold Case 2024 Victim Sheet Investigation Request, Bonanza or similar restaurant and June 2020 outreach text.

S10. Born into a Crime Family 2025, memoir account of Alford garage and girls who reportedly named Nimitz.

S11. Beacon Hill Witness Disclosure, September 8, 2026, Pineville child lead and map reference. Louisiana work cluster details await an incident inventory.

S13. National Cold Case Month, nationalcoldcasemonth.org, organizer site identifying September as the observance; Forensic Magazine, September 16, 2024, describing the September 2024 observance as inaugural.

S14. Brian “Happy” Bryanson, personal account supplied September 24, 2026, naming 23andMe, MyHeritage and “Family tree”; precise third platform and consent settings unconfirmed.

The original editable map files and victim sheets should accompany an investigative submission when available. This packet reproduces five map and legend pages from the original diagrams, along with an overview schematic. No official case numbers, identified victims, or verified body counts are asserted.

Body grid map exhibits and additional location leads

The following are reproductions of my original witness-created diagrams. Their colored shapes and labels express recollections and interpretations, not surveyed coordinates, verified burials or body recoveries. Some labels in the original drawings are cropped; the source files should be preserved intact for investigators. The property and jurisdiction for each location must be confirmed before any authorized assessment.

Map ID	Reported area and claim	Map or status	First test
BG 01	4105 Twin Falls backyard: I report several burial locations, including a teen jogger, a neighboring child and other people. An older narrative estimates 14 graves; this is my estimate, not an established count.	Original BACKYARD 2026 grid reproduced below.	Historical parcel and alterations, utility and concrete work, occupancy, missing-person and death records.
BG 02	Twin Falls street, drainage and nearby blocks: I report recovery and disposal scenes; blue and green markers have separate meanings in my legend.	Original Twin Falls map and color key reproduced below.	Locate contemporaneous response and drainage-maintenance records; compare individual leads.
BG 03	Weatherford, near my mother Glenda’s family houses by the Palo Pinto / U.S. 180 corridor: I report burial markers beside or near the houses.	Original Mammy and Nana house body grid reproduced below.	Verify exact street name, historic parcels, house sites, colored-marker meanings and local death investigations.
BG 04	Unidentified DFW-area cul-de-sac and ravine: alleged disposal area, no confirmed coordinates.	Original ravine diagram reproduced below.	Period airport maps, aerials, access roads and jurisdictional death records.
BG 05	End of Crested Butte Drive, Irving: I now report one burial lead. Person, date, parcel and exact location are not supplied here.	No source map located among reviewed files; do not plot a point.	Confirm historical street geometry and parcel boundary; ask me for the original description or sketch; compare missing-person records.

Weatherford and the 4105 backyard are separate places and should receive separate jurisdictional referrals. The source maps cannot support a summed body total because their marks may represent events, remembered people, possible burials or areas, and some leads may overlap.

BG 02A Twin Falls marker legend

Reproduced from author-supplied diagram • witness-created, not surveyed or independently verified

BG 02B Twin Falls street and drainage grid

Reproduced from author-supplied diagram • witness-created, not surveyed or independently verified

BG 01 Backyard of 4105 Twin Falls

Reproduced from author-supplied diagram • witness-created, not surveyed or independently verified

BG 03 Weatherford Mammy and Nana house grid

Reproduced from author-supplied diagram • witness-created, not surveyed or independently verified

Source spelling reads “1120 PALO INTO STREET”; verify the historic Palo Pinto address and parcels before geolocation.

BG 04 DFW area ravine and cul-de-sac grid

Reproduced from author-supplied diagram • witness-created, not surveyed or independently verified

Continuing investigation into accounts I did not witness

This final section preserves leads I supplied on September 24, 2026, from family conversations and statements I recall hearing. It separates childhood observations from later interpretations. Each claim requires independent testing. [S12]

Robert Shelton employment travel and reported activity

I report that my father, Robert Stout Shelton, worked at General Dynamics in Fort Worth for more than twenty years and drove between Fort Worth and Irving during that employment. I believe he continued working for what I describe as a sex-trafficking enterprise well into the 1990s. I recall that he was rarely home during much of the 1970s and 1980s. My thought that he may have been hunting or seeking victims during those absences is an inference; I did not observe what he did on every trip or establish that an absence involved a crime. [S12]

A records review could establish the employer’s legal name during each year, his job and shift history where records survive, addresses, vehicle ownership and commuting period. Dated family calendars, travel records, hunting or fishing licenses and contemporaneous witness statements may help test particular absences. Ordinary work, travel and recreation must remain possible explanations unless independent evidence points elsewhere.

Alford statements about his badge

I recall Sgt. Jim Alford bragging that he used his police badge to arrest high-school girls during the 1970s and 1980s. This is my recollection of a statement, not an independently established arrest, abduction or victim identification. I ask an investigator to confirm his assignments and compare any surviving juvenile arrest logs, custody and transport records, school complaints, internal-affairs material and missing-person records, with the privacy protections those records require. [S12]

Family conversation lead log

Lead	How I learned it	What is unresolved	Independent check
Continued trafficking activity into the 1990s	Family conversation and my later interpretation	Who said what, when, and whether a particular event or person can be named	Record each speaker’s exact words, dates and firsthand basis before case comparison
Fort Worth employment and Irving commute	Family knowledge and recollection	Exact employer entity, dates, shifts and travel pattern	Personnel, tax, union, residence and vehicle records where lawfully retained
Long absences during the 1970s and 1980s	My childhood observation of his absence	Purpose and destination of any particular absence	Contemporaneous household, work, travel and witness records
Badge used to arrest high-school girls	My recollection of Alford’s bragging	Whether he made the statement and whether any arrest or misconduct occurred	Assignment, juvenile custody, transport, complaint and missing-person comparison

I can supply the speaker, words, approximate date and setting for each conversation. These leads do not allege that General Dynamics or its employees participated in any offense.

Bibliography of source works and public context

These are the works used to assemble this packet. A source work documents an account or map; it does not independently corroborate the event. Preserve original files and creation metadata with this summary.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Three Red Headed Girls Combined Victim Sheets. 2020. Three original sheets reproduced intact at the end.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Twin Falls Cold Case Lead Packet. July 29, 2026. Eight structured leads covering drainage and Lee Britain accounts.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Twin Falls Abduction and Discarded Map. 2026. Color event map and legend, reproduced above.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Backyard. 2026. 4105 Twin Falls grid, reproduced above.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Mammy and Nana House Body Grid. 2026. Weatherford family property grid, reproduced above.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Ravine Dump Site. 2026. DFW cul-de-sac grid, reproduced above.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Irving Body Map. 2026. Highway 183 and golf-range lead.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Cub Scout Newly Recalled Victim Sheet. September 7, 2026.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Beacon Hill Witness Disclosure. September 8, 2026. Pineville child and orientation map.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Cold Case 2024 Victim Sheet Investigation Request. Bonanza or similar restaurant account.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Born into a Crime Family. 2025. Memoir account of reported Alford garage and Nimitz students.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Letter to Dr Rachel Toles. 2026. Cheerleader and school-related priority leads.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Forensic Times Reply. September 2026. Supplied LinkedIn conversation about the sisters.

· Bryanson, Brian “Happy.” Additional packet instructions. September 24, 2026. Crested Butte, work/travel, badge, age and genealogy information.

· National Cold Case Month / Solve the Case. “September is National Cold Case Month.” nationalcoldcasemonth.org. Accessed September 2026.

· Taylor, Michelle. “A New Kind of Database for National Cold Case Month.” Forensic Magazine, September 16, 2024.

Individual victim lead sheets

Each sheet below is an editorial summary grounded in a named source. No listed person is independently identified here. The three original red-haired sisters sheets follow in full, preserving their original wording, layout and colors.

Lead sheet TF 01 Boy in Scout clothing; approximate teen

SOURCE STATUS Witness recollection and editorial summary from S2. Not an official case record, identified victim, established disappearance or medical finding.

Field	Current entry
Reported person	Boy in Scout clothing; approximate teen
Reported scene or location	Twin Falls drainage
Source account and distinctive detail	Earlier account describes a teen in Scout clothing associated with a reported drainage recovery. Compare with IR 05 before assuming two people.
Date and identity	Exact event date and person’s identity not independently established.
First records comparison	Reported recovery scene; compare police, EMS, ME and Scout records
Possible overlap	Compare Scout or neighboring-child accounts before counting a distinct person.
Agency disposition	Reference number: __________ Result: match / contradiction / no record / insufficient / referral